These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34551629)

  • 1. Finite element study on the influence of pore size and structure on stress shielding effect of additive manufactured spinal cage.
    Meena VK; Kalra P; Sinha RK
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Apr; 25(5):566-577. PubMed ID: 34551629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial Bone Formation in Additive Manufactured Porous Implants Reduces Predicted Stress and Danger of Fatigue Failure.
    Cheong VS; Fromme P; Coathup MJ; Mumith A; Blunn GW
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 48(1):502-514. PubMed ID: 31549330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel adaptive finite element algorithms to predict bone ingrowth in additive manufactured porous implants.
    Cheong VS; Fromme P; Mumith A; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Nov; 87():230-239. PubMed ID: 30086415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
    Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment.
    Taniguchi N; Fujibayashi S; Takemoto M; Sasaki K; Otsuki B; Nakamura T; Matsushita T; Kokubo T; Matsuda S
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Feb; 59():690-701. PubMed ID: 26652423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing.
    Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with various porous additive manufactured cages.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Xiang D; Liao Z; Liu W
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Apr; 95():167-174. PubMed ID: 29501735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Porous structure design and mechanical behavior analysis based on TPMS for customized root analogue implant.
    Song K; Wang Z; Lan J; Ma S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104222. PubMed ID: 33310682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and manufacturing of patient-specific Ti6Al4V implants with inhomogeneous porosity.
    Rana M; Karmakar S; Bandyopadhyay A; Roychowdhury A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jul; 143():105925. PubMed ID: 37244075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary exploration of the biomechanical properties of three novel cervical porous fusion cages using a finite element study.
    Xu Z; Li Y; Huang W; Wang Z; Xu X; Tian S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Nov; 24(1):876. PubMed ID: 37950220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical interaction between additive-manufactured metal lattice structures and bone in compression: implications for stress shielding of orthopaedic implants.
    Liverani E; Rogati G; Pagani S; Brogini S; Fortunato A; Caravaggi P
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Sep; 121():104608. PubMed ID: 34077904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and mechanical characterization of porous titanium bone substitutes.
    Barbas A; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P; Pesci R; Dubois G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 May; 9():34-44. PubMed ID: 22498281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bionic mechanical design and 3D printing of novel porous Ti6Al4V implants for biomedical applications.
    Peng WM; Liu YF; Jiang XF; Dong XT; Jun J; Baur DA; Xu JJ; Pan H; Xu X
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2019 Aug.; 20(8):647-659. PubMed ID: 31273962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue behavior of thin-walled grade 2 titanium samples processed by selective laser melting. Application to life prediction of porous titanium implants.
    Lipinski P; Barbas A; Bonnet AS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Dec; 28():274-90. PubMed ID: 24008139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of mechanical properties of Ti-25Nb BCC porous cell structure and their association with structure porosity: A combined finite element analysis and analytical approach for orthopedic application.
    Chowdhury S; Anand A; Singh A; Pal B
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Jul; 235(7):827-837. PubMed ID: 33899579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages.
    Sun J; Wang Q; Cai D; Gu W; Ma Y; Sun Y; Wei Y; Yuan F
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):390. PubMed ID: 33902500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical investigation into the structural design of porous additive manufactured cages using numerical and experimental approaches.
    Tsai PI; Hsu CC; Chen SY; Wu TH; Huang CC
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Sep; 76():14-23. PubMed ID: 27392226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Porous Microstructures on the Biomechanical Characteristics of a Root Analogue Implant: An Animal Study and a Finite Element Analysis.
    Liu T; Chen Y; Apicella A; Mu Z; Yu T; Huang Y; Wang C
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2020 Nov; 6(11):6356-6367. PubMed ID: 33449664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Unit Cell Type and Pore Size on Porosity and Mechanical Behavior of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Scaffolds.
    Zaharin HA; Abdul Rani AM; Azam FI; Ginta TL; Sallih N; Ahmad A; Yunus NA; Zulkifli TZA
    Materials (Basel); 2018 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 30487419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.