These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34551728)

  • 1. Pre-selection against a lethal recessive allele in breeding schemes with optimum-contribution selection or truncation selection.
    Hjortø L; Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):75. PubMed ID: 34551728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.
    Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Su G; Nielsen HM; Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):39. PubMed ID: 31286868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breeding schemes with optimum-contribution selection or truncation selection for beef cattle destined for use on dairy females.
    Hjortø L; Andersen T; Kargo M; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 May; 105(5):4314-4323. PubMed ID: 35307183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.
    Liu H; Henryon M; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 27531662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Most of the long-term genetic gain from optimum-contribution selection can be realised with restrictions imposed during optimisation.
    Henryon M; Ostersen T; Ask B; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):21. PubMed ID: 25887703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of advanced Optimum Contribution Selection in small-scale breeding schemes: prospects and challenges in Vorderwald cattle.
    Kohl S; Wellmann R; Herold P
    Animal; 2020 Mar; 14(3):452-463. PubMed ID: 31597583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic mating as sustainable breeding for Chinese indigenous Ningxiang pigs.
    He J; Wu XL; Zeng Q; Li H; Ma H; Jiang J; Rosa GJM; Gianola D; Tait RG; Bauck S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236629. PubMed ID: 32797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New cycle, same old mistakes? Overlapping vs. discrete generations in long-term recurrent selection.
    Labroo MR; Rutkoski JE
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):736. PubMed ID: 36316650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential of gene drives with genome editing to increase genetic gain in livestock breeding programs.
    Gonen S; Jenko J; Gorjanc G; Mileham AJ; Whitelaw CB; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):3. PubMed ID: 28093068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective advantage of implementing optimal contributions selection and timescales for the convergence of long-term genetic contributions.
    Howard DM; Pong-Wong R; Knap PW; Kremer VD; Woolliams JA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):24. PubMed ID: 29747576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in genome-wide and region-specific genetic diversity in the Dutch-Flemish Holstein-Friesian breeding program from 1986 to 2015.
    Doekes HP; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Hiemstra SJ; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):15. PubMed ID: 29642838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 11929623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advanced optimum contribution selection as a tool to improve regional cattle breeds: a feasibility study for Vorderwald cattle.
    Kohl S; Wellmann R; Herold P
    Animal; 2020 Jan; 14(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 31296274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding.
    Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):27. PubMed ID: 22898324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection with inbreeding control in simulated young bull schemes for local dairy cattle breeds.
    Gandini G; Stella A; Del Corvo M; Jansen GB
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1790-8. PubMed ID: 24440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
    Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maximizing genetic gain over multiple generations with quantitative trait locus selection and control of inbreeding.
    Villanueva B; Dekkers JC; Woolliams JA; Settar P
    J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1305-14. PubMed ID: 15144069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.