These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34551728)

  • 21. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Moving Beyond Managing Realized Genomic Relationship in Long-Term Genomic Selection.
    De Beukelaer H; Badke Y; Fack V; De Meyer G
    Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):1127-1138. PubMed ID: 28381589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term impact of conventional and optimal contribution conservation methods on genetic diversity and genetic gain in local pig breeds.
    Zhao Q; Liu H; Qadri QR; Wang Q; Pan Y; Su G
    Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Dec; 127(6):546-553. PubMed ID: 34750534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimization of selection contribution and mate allocations in monoecious tree breeding populations.
    Hallander J; Waldmann P
    BMC Genet; 2009 Nov; 10():70. PubMed ID: 19895684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
    Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mitigation of inbreeding while preserving genetic gain in genomic breeding programs for outbred plants.
    Lin Z; Shi F; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Theor Appl Genet; 2017 May; 130(5):969-980. PubMed ID: 28364262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection against genetic defects in conservation schemes while controlling inbreeding.
    Sonesson AK; Janss LL; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2003; 35(4):353-68. PubMed ID: 12927071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):70. PubMed ID: 26370143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increasing long-term response by selecting for favorable minor alleles.
    Sun C; VanRaden PM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88510. PubMed ID: 24505495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Controlling Coancestry and Thereby Future Inbreeding by Optimum-Contribution Selection Using Alternative Genomic-Relationship Matrices.
    Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC; Henryon M; Meuwissen T
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():345. PubMed ID: 32425971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of Seven Tree Breeding Strategies Under Conditions of Inbreeding Depression.
    Wu HX; Hallingbäck HR; Sánchez L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jan; 6(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 26739644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software.
    Upperman LR; Kinghorn BP; MacNeil MD; Van Eenennaam AL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):36. PubMed ID: 31382878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Jun; 41(1):37. PubMed ID: 19566932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of using different culling regimens on genetic response with two-trait, two-stage selection in a nucleus broiler stock.
    Mehrabani-Yeganeh H; Gibson JP; Uimari P
    Poult Sci; 1999 Jul; 78(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 10404671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Balancing selection on a recessive lethal deletion with pleiotropic effects on two neighboring genes in the porcine genome.
    Derks MFL; Lopes MS; Bosse M; Madsen O; Dibbits B; Harlizius B; Groenen MAM; Megens HJ
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Sep; 14(9):e1007661. PubMed ID: 30231021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficient selection against categorically scored hip dysplasia in dogs is possible using best linear unbiased prediction and optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.
    Malm S; Sørensen AC; Fikse WF; Strandberg E
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Apr; 130(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23496016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study.
    Sonesson AK
    Genet Sel Evol; 2005; 37(6):587-99. PubMed ID: 16277969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mating animals by minimising the covariance between ancestral contributions generates less inbreeding without compromising genetic gain in breeding schemes with truncation selection.
    Henryon M; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    Animal; 2009 Oct; 3(10):1339-46. PubMed ID: 22444927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.