These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34551943)

  • 1. Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient-public involvement contributors.
    Paddock K; Woolfall K; Frith L; Watkins M; Gamble C; Welters I; Young B
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e048193. PubMed ID: 34551943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers' and patients' interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials.
    Dudley L; Gamble C; Allam A; Bell P; Buck D; Goodare H; Hanley B; Preston J; Walker A; Williamson P; Young B
    Trials; 2015 Apr; 16():190. PubMed ID: 25928689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient and public involvement in randomised clinical trials: a mixed-methods study of a clinical trials unit to identify good practice, barriers and facilitators.
    Selman LE; Clement C; Douglas M; Douglas K; Taylor J; Metcalfe C; Lane JA; Horwood J
    Trials; 2021 Oct; 22(1):735. PubMed ID: 34688304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
    Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.
    Paddock K; Woolfall K; Kearney A; Pattison N; Frith L; Gamble C; Welters I; Trinder J; Young B
    BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e066149. PubMed ID: 36375987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A; Bartholomew K; Aagaard N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0235618. PubMed ID: 32756563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials.
    Dudley L; Gamble C; Preston J; Buck D; ; Hanley B; Williamson P; Young B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128817. PubMed ID: 26053063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials.
    Buck D; Gamble C; Dudley L; Preston J; Hanley B; Williamson PR; Young B; ;
    BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e006400. PubMed ID: 25475243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seven-step framework to enhance practitioner explanations and parental understandings of research without prior consent in paediatric emergency and critical care trials.
    Roper L; Lyttle MD; Gamble C; Humphreys A; Messahel S; Lee ED; Noblet J; Hickey H; Rainford N; Iyer A; Appleton R; Woolfall K
    Emerg Med J; 2021 Mar; 38(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 32862140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study.
    Xu A; Baysari MT; Stocker SL; Leow LJ; Day RO; Carland JE
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 33008387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of participant recruitment strategies for critical care trials: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.
    Raven-Gregg T; Wood F; Shepherd V
    Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 18(4):436-448. PubMed ID: 33530728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unpacking the 'black box of horrendousness': a qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to conducting trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent.
    Shepherd V; Hood K; Wood F
    Trials; 2022 Jun; 23(1):471. PubMed ID: 35668460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting and appraising the context, process and impact of PPI on contributors, researchers and the trial during a randomised controlled trial - the 3D study.
    Mann C; Chilcott S; Plumb K; Brooks E; Man MS
    Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():15. PubMed ID: 29785283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategies for Enhancing Family Participation in Research in the ICU: Findings From a Qualitative Study.
    Dotolo D; Nielsen EL; Curtis JR; Engelberg RA
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2017 Aug; 54(2):226-230.e1. PubMed ID: 28438584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing the informed consent process for critical care research: strategies from a thromboprophylaxis trial.
    Smith OM; McDonald E; Zytaruk N; Foster D; Matte A; Clarke F; Fleury S; Krause K; McArdle T; Skrobik Y; Cook DJ
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2013 Dec; 29(6):300-9. PubMed ID: 23871290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.
    Moodley K; Singh S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: Impact, resources and recommendations.
    Coupe N; Mathieson A
    Health Expect; 2020 Feb; 23(1):125-136. PubMed ID: 31613049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinctions and blurred boundaries between qualitative approaches and public and patient involvement (PPI) in research.
    Mc Menamin R; Isaksen J; Manning M; Tierney E
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Oct; 24(5):515-526. PubMed ID: 35762365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in primary care research: a mixed methods study.
    Blackburn S; McLachlan S; Jowett S; Kinghorn P; Gill P; Higginbottom A; Rhodes C; Stevenson F; Jinks C
    Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():16. PubMed ID: 29850029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.