These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34552522)
1. Persuasive Features of Scientific Explanations: Explanatory Schemata of Physical and Psychosocial Phenomena. Schoenherr JR; Thomson R Front Psychol; 2021; 12():644809. PubMed ID: 34552522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cognitive explanations of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia: An inventory of the scientific literature]. Livet A; Salomé F Encephale; 2020 Jun; 46(3):217-221. PubMed ID: 32156419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competing Explanations of Competing Explanations: Accounting for Conflict Between Scientific and Folk Explanations. Shtulman A; Legare CH Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1337-1362. PubMed ID: 31762226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Kelemen D; Rottman J; Seston R J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1074-83. PubMed ID: 23067062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific and Folk Theories of Viral Transmission: A Comparison of COVID-19 and the Common Cold. Labotka D; Gelman SA Front Psychol; 2022; 13():929120. PubMed ID: 35837651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Rozenblit L; Keil F Cogn Sci; 2002 Sep; 26(5):521-562. PubMed ID: 21442007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The animacy advantage in memory occurs under self-paced study conditions, but participants' metacognitive beliefs can deter it. Serra MJ; DeYoung CM Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1164038. PubMed ID: 37251066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Network explanations and explanatory directionality. Jansson L Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Apr; 375(1796):20190318. PubMed ID: 32089115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simplicity and complexity preferences in causal explanation: An opponent heuristic account. Johnson SGB; Valenti JJ; Keil FC Cogn Psychol; 2019 Sep; 113():101222. PubMed ID: 31200208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model. Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 30047766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]