272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34553796)
1. The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era.
Galla SJ; Brown L; Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti Waewae Y; Cubrinovska I; Eason D; Gooley RM; Hamilton JA; Heath JA; Hauser SS; Latch EK; Matocq MD; Richardson A; Wold JR; Hogg CJ; Santure AW; Steeves TE
Mol Ecol; 2022 Jan; 31(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 34553796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
Wang J
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide.
Galla SJ; Moraga R; Brown L; Cleland S; Hoeppner MP; Maloney RF; Richardson A; Slater L; Santure AW; Steeves TE
Evol Appl; 2020 May; 13(5):991-1008. PubMed ID: 32431748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kinship-based management strategies for captive breeding programs when pedigrees are unknown or uncertain.
Putnam AS; Ivy JA
J Hered; 2014; 105(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24143031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of Genomic Estimation Methods of Inbreeding and Population Structure in an Arabian Horse Herd.
Al Abri MA; König von Borstel U; Strecker V; Brooks SA
J Hered; 2017 Jun; 108(4):361-368. PubMed ID: 28444202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impacts of early viability selection on management of inbreeding and genetic diversity in conservation.
Grueber CE; Hogg CJ; Ivy JA; Belov K
Mol Ecol; 2015 Apr; 24(8):1645-53. PubMed ID: 25735639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing genome-based estimates of relatedness for use in pedigree-based conservation management.
Hauser SS; Galla SJ; Putnam AS; Steeves TE; Latch EK
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2546-2558. PubMed ID: 35510790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedigree reconstruction and distant pairwise relatedness estimation from genome sequence data: A demonstration in a population of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).
Petty LE; Phillippi-Falkenstein K; Kubisch HM; Raveendran M; Harris RA; Vallender EJ; Huff CD; Bohm RP; Rogers J; Below JE
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 May; 21(4):1333-1346. PubMed ID: 33386679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The future is now: Amplicon sequencing and sequence capture usher in the conservation genomics era.
Meek MH; Larson WA
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):795-803. PubMed ID: 30681776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invited review: Inbreeding in the genomics era: Inbreeding, inbreeding depression, and management of genomic variability.
Howard JT; Pryce JE; Baes C; Maltecca C
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Aug; 100(8):6009-6024. PubMed ID: 28601448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conservation genomics of threatened animal species.
Steiner CC; Putnam AS; Hoeck PE; Ryder OA
Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2013 Jan; 1():261-81. PubMed ID: 25387020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.
Zhang J; Song H; Zhang Q; Ding X
Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 31708004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threatened Species Initiative: Empowering conservation action using genomic resources.
Hogg CJ; Ottewell K; Latch P; Rossetto M; Biggs J; Gilbert A; Richmond S; Belov K
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jan; 119(4):. PubMed ID: 35042806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. swinger: a user-friendly computer program to establish captive breeding groups that minimize relatedness without pedigree information.
Sandoval-Castillo J; Attard CR; Marri S; Brauer CJ; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 27754599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating population genetics and conservation biology in the era of genomics.
Ouborg NJ
Biol Lett; 2010 Feb; 6(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 19726442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.
Kardos M; Luikart G; Allendorf FW
Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Jul; 115(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 26059970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. QuickPed: an online tool for drawing pedigrees and analysing relatedness.
Vigeland MD
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):220. PubMed ID: 35672681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of pedigree- and DNA-based measures for identifying inbreeding depression in the critically endangered Attwater's Prairie-chicken.
Hammerly SC; Morrow ME; Johnson JA
Mol Ecol; 2013 Nov; 22(21):5313-28. PubMed ID: 24118220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suitability of Pedigree Information and Genomic Methods for Analyzing Inbreeding of Polish Cold-Blooded Horses Covered by Conservation Programs.
Polak G; Gurgul A; Jasielczuk I; Szmatoła T; Krupiński J; Bugno-Poniewierska M
Genes (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33802830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RAD-sequencing for estimating genomic relatedness matrix-based heritability in the wild: A case study in roe deer.
Gervais L; Perrier C; Bernard M; Merlet J; Pemberton JM; Pujol B; Quéméré E
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 31058463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
