These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34554180)

  • 1. The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade?
    Cohen IG; Adashi EY; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(15):1473-1474. PubMed ID: 34554180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
    Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roe v. Wade at twenty-nine: the future of abortion rights in the U.S. remains an open question.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():6-7. PubMed ID: 12436734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
    Cohen IG; Murray M; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(4):325-326. PubMed ID: 35802387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sara Weddington on Roe v. Wade. Interview by Lee Stockdale.
    Weddington S
    Health Matrix; 1989; 7(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 10294685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Harv Law Rev; 2016 Nov; 130(1):397-406. PubMed ID: 28117562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change?
    Joyce T
    J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
    Baron CH
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law.
    Morgan RG
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation.
    Will JF
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The partial death of abortion rights.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Poppema ST
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Gartner EC
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
    MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.