These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34554684)

  • 1. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhu L; Cai T; Shan Y; Zhang W; Zhang L; Feng X
    Pain Physician; 2021 Sep; 24(6):441-452. PubMed ID: 34554684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
    Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Luan H; Peng C; Liu K; Song X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Nov; 18(1):888. PubMed ID: 37993948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kou Y; Chang J; Guan X; Chang Q; Feng H
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e352-e368. PubMed ID: 34087465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of effectiveness between percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Liu J; Kong Q; Feng P; Zhang B; Ma J; Hu Y; Wu X; Shu X; Pu C
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):681-690. PubMed ID: 35712924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
    Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Haibier A; Yusufu A; Hang L; Abudurexiti T
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 19(1):92. PubMed ID: 38281015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han H; Song Y; Li Y; Zhou H; Fu Y; Li J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Sep; 18(1):656. PubMed ID: 37667363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Guo H; Song Y; Weng R; Tian H; Yuan J; Li Y
    Global Spine J; 2023 Jun; 13(5):1394-1404. PubMed ID: 36447426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ge M; Zhang Y; Ying H; Feng C; Li Y; Tian J; Zhao T; Shao H; Huang Y
    Int Orthop; 2022 Sep; 46(9):2063-2070. PubMed ID: 35723702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 270-degree percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of geriatric lateral recess stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Li Y; Cheng X; Chen B
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):183. PubMed ID: 36895012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.
    Chen H; Zheng G; Bian Z; Hou C; Li M; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wang X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 37245051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study.
    Shi L; Ding T; Shi Y; Wang F; Wu C
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1231-e1240. PubMed ID: 36096389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(1):328-337. PubMed ID: 33426744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous endoscopic versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Song YF; Wang H; Zhang JW; Li YM; Xue YD; Fu YF; Li J
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2022 Dec; 17(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 36818507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Outcomes Between Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Study.
    Xu H; Yu L; Xiao B; Zhao H; Gu X; Gao Z; Wang W
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():e98-e108. PubMed ID: 38008170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Meta-analysis.
    Xiao S; Zhou S; Pan S; Ning J; Gan X; Guan Y
    Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Mar; 37(2):56-66. PubMed ID: 36727763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of surgical invasiveness, hidden blood loss, and clinical outcome between unilateral biportal endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective cohort study.
    Huang X; Wang W; Chen G; Guan X; Zhou Y; Tang Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):274. PubMed ID: 37038129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.