161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34554849)
1. Do patient-reported outcome measures improve after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty?
; Siddiqi A; Warren J; Anis HK; Barsoum WK; Bloomfield MR; Briskin I; Brooks PJ; Higuera CA; Kamath AF; Klika A; Krebs O; Krebs VE; Mesko NW; Molloy RM; Mont MA; Murray TG; Muschler GF; Patel P; Stearns KL; Strnad GJ; Suarez JC; Piuzzi NS
Hip Int; 2023 Mar; 33(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 34554849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Pain, Function, and Quality of Life) After Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Piuzzi NS;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Oct; 102(20):e114. PubMed ID: 33086349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Time to Aseptic Failure After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Affect Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes?
Villa JM; Pannu TS; Ozery M; Jin Y; Piuzzi NS; Patel PD; Higuera CA
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Jan; 39(1):180-186. PubMed ID: 37531980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and re-revision rates are not associated with the indication for revision total hip arthroplasty : a prospective evaluation of 647 consecutive patients.
Innocenti M; Smulders K; Willems JH; Goosen JHM; van Hellemondt G
Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul; 104-B(7):859-866. PubMed ID: 35775171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Between Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Realistic Patient Expectations for Patients With Low Baseline Activity.
Dubin J; Westrich G
Orthopedics; 2022; 45(4):251-255. PubMed ID: 35245136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative Veteran RAND-12 Mental Composite Score of >60 Associated With Increased Likelihood of Patient Satisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Grits D; Emara AK; Orr MN; Rullán PJ; Murray TG; Higuera CA; Krebs VE; Molloy RM; Piuzzi NS
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7 Suppl 2):S258-S264. PubMed ID: 36516888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative cut-off values for body mass index deny patients clinically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty.
; Arnold N; Anis H; Barsoum WK; Bloomfield MR; Brooks PJ; Higuera CA; Kamath AF; Klika A; Krebs VE; Mesko NW; Molloy RM; Mont MA; Murray TG; Patel PD; Strnad G; Stearns KL; Warren J; Zajichek A; Piuzzi NS
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6):683-692. PubMed ID: 32475239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Acetabular Bone Loss Severity Associate With Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Reoperation Rate in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Driscoll DA; Anderson CG; Bornes TD; Nocon A; Bostrom MPG; Sculco TP; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S189-S193. PubMed ID: 37088225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-reported outcomes at 1 and 2 years after total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the minimum required follow-up?
Piuzzi NS;
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Sep; 142(9):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 33606086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The extent of first-time THA revision is not associated with patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up: a study of 426 aseptic revisions.
Winther SB; Klaksvik J; Foss OA; Wik TS; Egeberg T; Husby OS
Acta Orthop; 2023 Jul; 94():360-365. PubMed ID: 37493288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Demonstrate Less Improvement and Significantly Higher Rates of Worsening Compared to Primaries.
Salimy MS; Paschalidis A; Dunahoe JA; ; Bedair HS; Melnic CM
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Nov; 38(11):2410-2414. PubMed ID: 37271232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When is Surgery Performed? Trends, Demographic Associations, and Phenotypical Characterization of Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Before Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Emara AK; Orr MN; Klika AK; McLaughlin JP; Molloy RM; Piuzzi NS
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1083-1091.e3. PubMed ID: 35202757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-reported outcome after primary and aseptic revision hip arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up of 3,559 primary and 406 revision THAs in an institutional registry.
Wik TS; Klaksvik J; Husby OS; Rasch A; Winther SB
Acta Orthop; 2022 Jan; 93():132-137. PubMed ID: 34984475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a fluoroscopy-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system resulted in greater improvements in hip-specific outcome measures at one-year compared to a CT-based robotic-assisted system.
Ong CB; Buchan GBJ; Hecht CJ; Liu D; Petterwood J; Kamath AF
Int J Med Robot; 2024 Jun; 20(3):e2650. PubMed ID: 38856120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision after Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged ≤55 Years.
Sarpong NO; Kaidi AC; Syku M; Mensah C; Blevins JL; Chalmers BP
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8):1626-1630. PubMed ID: 35318097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissatisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated With Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Phenotypes.
Orr MN; Klika AK; Emara AK; ; Piuzzi NS
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S498-S509. PubMed ID: 35279339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Implant Selection Affect Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Campbell A; Emara AK; Klika A; Piuzzi NS;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Dec; 103(24):2306-2317. PubMed ID: 34495897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at One Year Postoperatively in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Bendich I; Tarity TD; Alpaugh K; Lyman S; Sculco PK; McLawhorn AS
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Aug; 37(8S):S954-S957. PubMed ID: 35091032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Similar Superior Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Anterior and Posterolateral Approaches After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Improvement After 3 months in 12,774 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties Using the Anterior, Anterolateral, Straight Lateral, or Posterolateral Approach.
Peters RM; van Beers LWAH; van Steenbergen LN; Wolkenfelt J; Ettema HB; Ten Have BLEF; Rijk PC; Stevens M; Bulstra SK; Poolman RW; Zijlstra WP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 29502965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
