These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34555920)

  • 1. Settled Insanity: Substance Use Meets the Insanity Defense.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2022 Jan; 73(1):105-107. PubMed ID: 34555920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intoxication and settled insanity: a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Feix J; Wolber G
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 17592162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary: intoxication and settled insanity--unsettled matters.
    Leong GB; Leisenring SE; Dean MD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 17592163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insanity defenses: contested or conceded?
    Rogers JL; Bloom JD; Manson SM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):885-8. PubMed ID: 6731639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with a successful insanity plea.
    Steadman HJ; Keitner L; Braff J; Arvanites TM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Apr; 140(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 6837773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mentally disordered offenders and the law: Research update on the insanity defense, 2004-2019.
    Adjorlolo S; Chan HCO; DeLisi M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 67():101507. PubMed ID: 31785724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications.
    Jeffrey RW; Pasewark RA; Bieber S
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3365477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Updating toxic psychosis into 21st-century Canadian: Bouchard-Lebrun v. R.
    Watts J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(3):374-81. PubMed ID: 24051590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Criminal insanity in Bulgaria and Norway: Analysing the prospect of a common approach.
    Gröning L; Dimitrova S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2023; 87():101866. PubMed ID: 36724723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structured instruments for insanity defense evaluations: Opportunities and limitations.
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Ferracuti S
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(5):432-444. PubMed ID: 36938899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The insanity defense on trial.
    Stone AA
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Aug; 33(8):636-40. PubMed ID: 7118098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overlapping universe: understanding legal insanity and psychosis.
    Torry ZD; Billick SB
    Psychiatr Q; 2010 Sep; 81(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 20373024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Insanity defense typology.
    Brown KP
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 29676495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychopathic disorders and criminal responsibility in the USA.
    Felthous AR
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 260 Suppl 2():S137-41. PubMed ID: 20936297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychosis and Substance Use: Implications for Conditional Release Readiness Evaluations.
    Tabernik HE; Vitacco MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):295-307. PubMed ID: 27021306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hendricks v. People: forcing the insanity defense on an unwilling defendant.
    Miller RD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 12108569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not guilty by reason of insanity: a research note.
    Pogrebin M; Regoli R; Perry K
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 8(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 3957527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.