These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34556013)
1. Evaluation of the quality of health and safety services with SERVPERF and multi-attribute decision-making methods. Alp S; Yilmaz F; Geçici E Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Dec; 28(4):2216-2226. PubMed ID: 34556013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches. Heidarisoltanabadi M; Elhami B; Imanmehr A; Khadivi A Food Sci Nutr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 38370082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Based AHP and Fuzzy COPRAS for Machine Tool Evaluation. Nguyen HT; Md Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Aoyama H; Case K PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0133599. PubMed ID: 26368541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Studying Significant Factors Associated with Frequent Lane Changing. Moslem S; Farooq D; Jamal A; Almarhabi Y; Almoshaogeh M; Butt FM; Tufail RF Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 35327878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision making in human resource management: a systematic review of the applications of analytic hierarchy process. Salehzadeh R; Ziaeian M Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1400772. PubMed ID: 39188870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India. Tripathi AK; Agrawal S; Gupta RD GeoJournal; 2022; 87(5):3507-3528. PubMed ID: 34075269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Cooperative Game Theory Combined Multiple Mobile Robot Navigation Algorithm. Kim C; Won JS Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(10):. PubMed ID: 32429339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analysis of the Vietnamese system of occupational safety and health and setting priorities with the analytical hierarchy process. Matsuda S Occup Environ Med; 1996 Apr; 53(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 8664968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying, evaluating and prioritizing the causes of occupational accidents in the construction industry using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Abbasinia M; Mohammadfam I Work; 2022; 72(3):933-940. PubMed ID: 35634821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Occupational stressors among firefighters: application of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)Techniques. Rajabi F; Molaeifar H; Jahangiri M; Taheri S; Banaee S; Farhadi P Heliyon; 2020 Apr; 6(4):e03820. PubMed ID: 32368655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of interval-valued fuzzy GRA with SERVPERF based on subjective and objective weights for evaluation of airline service quality: A case study of Korea low-cost carriers. Lee S; Kang D PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0219739. PubMed ID: 31386667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the Importance of Treatment Goals in Patients with Psoriasis: Analytic Hierarchy Process vs. Likert Scales. Gutknecht M; Danner M; Schaarschmidt ML; Gross C; Augustin M Patient; 2018 Aug; 11(4):425-437. PubMed ID: 29450833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybridized fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy weighted average for identifying optimal design concept. Olabanji OM; Mpofu K Heliyon; 2020 Jan; 6(1):e03182. PubMed ID: 32021922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk assessment of mega-city infrastructures related to land subsidence using improved trapezoidal FAHP. Lyu HM; Shen SL; Zhou A; Yang J Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 717():135310. PubMed ID: 31839300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analytic hierarchy process as module for productivity evaluation and decision-making of the operation theater. Ezzat AE; Hamoud HS Avicenna J Med; 2016; 6(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 26955599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strategies for controlling violence against health care workers: Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy additive ratio assessment. Rajabi F; Jahangiri M; Bagherifard F; Banaee S; Farhadi P J Nurs Manag; 2020 May; 28(4):777-786. PubMed ID: 32104935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ranking and comparing occupational health and safety system performance indicators in hospitals by the analytic hierarchy process. Aslan I Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Sep; 28(3):1937-1947. PubMed ID: 34126872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occupational stress among nurses and pre-hospital emergency staff: application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) method. Rajabi F; Jahangiri M; Molaeifar H; Honarbakhsh M; Farhadi P EXCLI J; 2018; 17():808-824. PubMed ID: 30233280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]