These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34556078)

  • 1. Which experimental procedures influence the apparent proximal femoral stiffness? A parametric study.
    Amini M; Reisinger A; Hirtler L; Pahr D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):815. PubMed ID: 34556078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The predictive ability of a QCT-FE model of the proximal femoral stiffness under multiple load cases is strongly influenced by experimental uncertainties.
    Amini M; Reisinger A; Synek A; Hirtler L; Pahr D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Mar; 139():105664. PubMed ID: 36657193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
    Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In Vivo Assessment of Age- and Loading Configuration-Related Changes in Multiscale Mechanical Behavior of the Human Proximal Femur Using MRI-Based Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang L; Wang L; Fu R; Wang J; Yang D; Liu Y; Zhang W; Liang W; Yang R; Yang H; Cheng X
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Mar; 53(3):905-912. PubMed ID: 33075178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can CT image deblurring improve finite element predictions at the proximal femur?
    Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Pakdel A; Whyne C; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():337-351. PubMed ID: 27450036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
    Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of loading rate on the of mechanical behavior of the femur in falling condition.
    Askarinejad S; Johnson JE; Rahbar N; Troy KL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Aug; 96():269-278. PubMed ID: 31075748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Material mapping strategy to improve the predicted response of the proximal femur to a sideways fall impact.
    Enns-Bray WS; Bahaloo H; Fleps I; Ariza O; Gilchrist S; Widmer R; Guy P; Pálsson H; Ferguson SJ; Cripton PA; Helgason B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Feb; 78():196-205. PubMed ID: 29172124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of femur strain under different loading scenarios: Experimental testing.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Zhang Y; Gu Y
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Jan; 235(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 32811293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
    Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro.
    Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
    Bone; 2013 Jan; 52(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 22985891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DXA predictions of human femoral mechanical properties depend on the load configuration.
    Dall'Ara E; Luisier B; Schmidt R; Pretterklieber M; Kainberger F; Zysset P; Pahr D
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1564-72; discussion 1564. PubMed ID: 23684578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.
    Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Balistreri L; Baruffaldi F; Bordini B; Viceconti M; Albisinni U; Ceccarelli F; Milandri L; Toni A; Taddei F
    Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():71-80. PubMed ID: 25014885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the proximal femur as much as age-related bone loss.
    Pinilla TP; Boardman KC; Bouxsein ML; Myers ER; Hayes WC
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1996 Apr; 58(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 8661953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of the modulus-density relationship and the material mapping method on the simulated mechanical response of the proximal femur in side-ways fall loading configuration.
    Helgason B; Gilchrist S; Ariza O; Vogt P; Enns-Bray W; Widmer RP; Fitze T; Pálsson H; Pauchard Y; Guy P; Ferguson SJ; Cripton PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Jul; 38(7):679-689. PubMed ID: 27185044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of cortex thickness on intact femur biomechanics: a comparison of finite element analysis with synthetic femurs.
    Zdero R; Bougherara H; Dubov A; Shah S; Zalzal P; Mahfud A; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(7):831-40. PubMed ID: 20839651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proximal femur bone strength estimated by a computationally fast finite element analysis in a sideways fall configuration.
    Nishiyama KK; Gilchrist S; Guy P; Cripton P; Boyd SK
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1231-6. PubMed ID: 23540722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for the structure capacity of proximal femur during falling--(II). The effects of falling configuration and load locations on the structural capacity of the proximal femur].
    Fan L; Wang E
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 23(6):1245-9. PubMed ID: 17228718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping anisotropy improves QCT-based finite element estimation of hip strength in pooled stance and side-fall load configurations.
    Panyasantisuk J; Dall'Ara E; Pretterklieber M; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Sep; 59():36-42. PubMed ID: 30131112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.