155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34556174)
21. Establishment of TP53-knockout canine cells using optimized CRIPSR/Cas9 vector system for canine cancer research.
Eun K; Park MG; Jeong YW; Jeong YI; Hyun SH; Hwang WS; Kim SH; Kim H
BMC Biotechnol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 30606176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ENCoRE: an efficient software for CRISPR screens identifies new players in extrinsic apoptosis.
Trümbach D; Pfeiffer S; Poppe M; Scherb H; Doll S; Wurst W; Schick JA
BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):905. PubMed ID: 29178829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CRISPR/CAS9-based DNA damage response screens reveal gene-drug interactions.
Su D; Feng X; Colic M; Wang Y; Zhang C; Wang C; Tang M; Hart T; Chen J
DNA Repair (Amst); 2020 Mar; 87():102803. PubMed ID: 31991288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. caRpools: an R package for exploratory data analysis and documentation of pooled CRISPR/Cas9 screens.
Winter J; Breinig M; Heigwer F; Brügemann D; Leible S; Pelz O; Zhan T; Boutros M
Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(4):632-4. PubMed ID: 26508755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Identification of functional regulatory elements in the human genome using pooled CRISPR screens.
Borys SM; Younger ST
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):107. PubMed ID: 32005150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pooled genome-wide CRISPR screening for basal and context-specific fitness gene essentiality in
Viswanatha R; Li Z; Hu Y; Perrimon N
Elife; 2018 Jul; 7():. PubMed ID: 30051818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Seed-effect modeling improves the consistency of genome-wide loss-of-function screens and identifies synthetic lethal vulnerabilities in cancer cells.
Jaiswal A; Peddinti G; Akimov Y; Wennerberg K; Kuznetsov S; Tang J; Aittokallio T
Genome Med; 2017 Jun; 9(1):51. PubMed ID: 28569207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities.
Hart T; Chandrashekhar M; Aregger M; Steinhart Z; Brown KR; MacLeod G; Mis M; Zimmermann M; Fradet-Turcotte A; Sun S; Mero P; Dirks P; Sidhu S; Roth FP; Rissland OS; Durocher D; Angers S; Moffat J
Cell; 2015 Dec; 163(6):1515-26. PubMed ID: 26627737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Deciphering essential cistromes using genome-wide CRISPR screens.
Fei T; Li W; Peng J; Xiao T; Chen CH; Wu A; Huang J; Zang C; Liu XS; Brown M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(50):25186-25195. PubMed ID: 31727847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. ELIMINATOR: essentiality analysis using multisystem networks and integer programming.
Antoranz A; Ortiz M; Pey J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):324. PubMed ID: 35933325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multiplex CRISPRi System Enables the Study of Stage-Specific Biofilm Genetic Requirements in Enterococcus faecalis.
Afonina I; Ong J; Chua J; Lu T; Kline KA
mBio; 2020 Oct; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 33082254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. BAGEL: a computational framework for identifying essential genes from pooled library screens.
Hart T; Moffat J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17():164. PubMed ID: 27083490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CRISPR screens in physiologic medium reveal conditionally essential genes in human cells.
Rossiter NJ; Huggler KS; Adelmann CH; Keys HR; Soens RW; Sabatini DM; Cantor JR
Cell Metab; 2021 Jun; 33(6):1248-1263.e9. PubMed ID: 33651980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A simple and practical workflow for genotyping of CRISPR-Cas9-based knockout phenotypes using multiplexed amplicon sequencing.
Iida M; Suzuki M; Sakane Y; Nishide H; Uchiyama I; Yamamoto T; Suzuki KT; Fujii S
Genes Cells; 2020 Jul; 25(7):498-509. PubMed ID: 32323394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. CoRe: a robustly benchmarked R package for identifying core-fitness genes in genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens.
Vinceti A; Karakoc E; Pacini C; Perron U; De Lucia RR; Garnett MJ; Iorio F
BMC Genomics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):828. PubMed ID: 34789150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identifying chemogenetic interactions from CRISPR screens with drugZ.
Colic M; Wang G; Zimmermann M; Mascall K; McLaughlin M; Bertolet L; Lenoir WF; Moffat J; Angers S; Durocher D; Hart T
Genome Med; 2019 Aug; 11(1):52. PubMed ID: 31439014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multiplex enCas12a screens detect functional buffering among paralogs otherwise masked in monogenic Cas9 knockout screens.
Dede M; McLaughlin M; Kim E; Hart T
Genome Biol; 2020 Oct; 21(1):262. PubMed ID: 33059726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Large-Scale Single Guide RNA Library Construction and Use for CRISPR-Cas9-Based Genetic Screens.
Wang T; Lander ES; Sabatini DM
Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2016 Mar; 2016(3):pdb.top086892. PubMed ID: 26933254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reconciling high-throughput gene essentiality data with metabolic network reconstructions.
Blazier AS; Papin JA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Apr; 15(4):e1006507. PubMed ID: 30973869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reframing gene essentiality in terms of adaptive flexibility.
Guzmán GI; Olson CA; Hefner Y; Phaneuf PV; Catoiu E; Crepaldi LB; Micas LG; Palsson BO; Feist AM
BMC Syst Biol; 2018 Dec; 12(1):143. PubMed ID: 30558585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
