BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34557021)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of the Ultrasound ADNEX Model for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors.
    Peng XS; Ma Y; Wang LL; Li HX; Zheng XL; Liu Y
    Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():5665-5673. PubMed ID: 34557021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
    Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
    Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
    Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.
    Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China.
    He P; Wang JJ; Duan W; Song C; Yang Y; Wu QQ
    J Ovarian Res; 2021 Dec; 14(1):169. PubMed ID: 34857005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
    Araujo KG; Jales RM; Pereira PN; Yoshida A; de Angelo Andrade L; Sarian LO; Derchain S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
    Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model combined with HE4 for identifying early-stage ovarian cancer.
    Yang S; Tang J; Rong Y; Wang M; Long J; Chen C; Wang C
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():949766. PubMed ID: 36185223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
    Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of ADNEX and IOTA two-step strategy and estimation of risk of complications during follow-up of adnexal masses in low-risk population.
    Pascual MA; Vancraeynest L; Timmerman S; Ceusters J; Ledger A; Graupera B; Rodriguez I; Valero B; Landolfo C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Van Calster B; Froyman W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.
    Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smolen A; Łoziński T; Guzik P; Kluz T
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of IOTA score and ADNEX model in the screening of ovarian malignancy in postmenopausal women.
    Nohuz E; De Simone L; Chêne G
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 48(2):103-107. PubMed ID: 29709594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of ultrasound-based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study.
    Hu Y; Chen B; Dong H; Sheng B; Xiao Z; Li J; Tian W; Lv F
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1101297. PubMed ID: 37168367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective study.
    Filiz AA; Kahyaoglu S; Atalay CR
    Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2024 Jan; 67(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 37822234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative Evaluation of the ADNEX Model for the Prediction of the Ovarian Cancer Risk of Adnexal Masses at Siriraj Hospital.
    Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A; Wongwananuruk T; Asumpinwong C; Panichyawat N; Chantrapanichkul P
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2021; 86(1-2):132-138. PubMed ID: 33596584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Cui L; Xu H; Zhang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 34217614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator.
    Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External validation of the IOTA ADNEX model performed by two independent gynecologic centers.
    Szubert S; Wojtowicz A; Moszynski R; Zywica P; Dyczkowski K; Stachowiak A; Sajdak S; Szpurek D; Alcazar JL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Sep; 142(3):490-5. PubMed ID: 27374142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.