228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34557537)
1. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Seven Measures to Reduce Tail Biting Lesions in Fattening Pigs.
Niemi JK; Edwards SA; Papanastasiou DK; Piette D; Stygar AH; Wallenbeck A; Valros A
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():682330. PubMed ID: 34557537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which is the most preventive measure against tail damage in finisher pigs: tail docking, straw provision or lowered stocking density?
Larsen MLV; Andersen HM; Pedersen LJ
Animal; 2018 Jun; 12(6):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29094665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A survey of straw use and tail biting in Swedish pig farms rearing undocked pigs.
Wallgren T; Westin R; Gunnarsson S
Acta Vet Scand; 2016 Dec; 58(1):84. PubMed ID: 27919291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Provision of straw by a foraging tower -effect on tail biting in weaners and fattening pigs.
Holling C; Grosse Beilage E; Vidondo B; Nathues C
Porcine Health Manag; 2017; 3():4. PubMed ID: 28405460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for tail lesions in undocked fattening pigs reared on Swiss farms.
Sell A; Vidondo B; Wechsler B; Burla J; Nathues H
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2020 Nov; 162(11):683-695. PubMed ID: 33140727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency of tail lesions and risk factors for tail biting in heavy pig production from weaning to 170 kg live weight.
Scollo A; Contiero B; Gottardo F
Vet J; 2016 Jan; 207():92-98. PubMed ID: 26626091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?
D'Eath RB; Arnott G; Turner SP; Jensen T; Lahrmann HP; Busch ME; Niemi JK; Lawrence AB; Sandøe P
Animal; 2014 Sep; 8(9):1479-97. PubMed ID: 25130712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High biosecurity and welfare standards in fattening pig farms are associated with reduced antimicrobial use.
Stygar AH; Chantziaras I; Toppari I; Maes D; Niemi JK
Animal; 2020 Oct; 14(10):2178-2186. PubMed ID: 32349838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why are most EU pigs tail docked? Economic and ethical analysis of four pig housing and management scenarios in the light of EU legislation and animal welfare outcomes.
D'Eath RB; Niemi JK; Vosough Ahmadi B; Rutherford KM; Ison SH; Turner SP; Anker HT; Jensen T; Busch ME; Jensen KK; Lawrence AB; Sandøe P
Animal; 2016 Apr; 10(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 26522665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Straw Provision in Racks on Tail Lesions, Straw Availability, and Pen Hygiene in Finishing Pigs.
Wallgren T; Gunnarsson S
Animals (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33540926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd.
Lahrmann HP; Busch ME; D'Eath RB; Forkman B; Hansen CF
Animal; 2017 Oct; 11(10):1825-1831. PubMed ID: 28294097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced Stocking Density and Provision of Straw in a Rack Improve Pig Welfare on Commercial Fattening Farms.
Schodl K; Wiesauer L; Winckler C; Leeb C
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():656211. PubMed ID: 34957270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cross-sectional study for predicting tail biting risk in pig farms using classification and regression tree analysis.
Scollo A; Gottardo F; Contiero B; Edwards SA
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():114-120. PubMed ID: 28992915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of amount of straw on pig and pen hygiene in partly slatted flooring systems.
Wallgren T; Lundeheim N; Gunnarsson S
BMC Vet Res; 2020 Oct; 16(1):377. PubMed ID: 33028323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Greek Pig Farmers' Perceptions and Experiences of Tail Biting and Tail Docking.
Kakanis M; Marinou K; Sossidou EN
Animals (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36830460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The "Real Welfare" scheme: Identification of risk and protective factors for welfare outcomes in commercial pig farms in the UK.
Pandolfi F; Kyriazakis I; Stoddart K; Wainwright N; Edwards SA
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Oct; 146():34-43. PubMed ID: 28992926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A High Enrichment Replenishment Rate Reduces Damaging Behaviors and Increases Growth Rate in Undocked Pigs Kept in Fully Slatted Pens.
Chou JY; Sandercock DA; D'Eath RB; O'Driscoll K
Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():584706. PubMed ID: 33282931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of pen design on tail biting and tail-directed behaviour of finishing pigs with intact tails.
Brandt P; Hakansson F; Jensen T; Nielsen MBF; Lahrmann HP; Hansen CF; Forkman B
Animal; 2020 May; 14(5):1034-1042. PubMed ID: 31735187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pig carcass tail lesions: the influence of record keeping through an advisory service and the relationship with farm performance parameters.
van Staaveren N; Teixeira DL; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
Animal; 2017 Jan; 11(1):140-146. PubMed ID: 27306695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Evidence for a Causal Link Between Disease and Damaging Behavior in Pigs.
Boyle LA; Edwards SA; Bolhuis JE; Pol F; Šemrov MZ; Schütze S; Nordgreen J; Bozakova N; Sossidou EN; Valros A
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():771682. PubMed ID: 35155642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
