These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34558614)

  • 61. Genetic, phenotypic and environmental relationships between sow body weight and sow productivity traits.
    Ferguson PW; Harvey WR; Irvin KM
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Feb; 60(2):375-84. PubMed ID: 4039308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparison of genomic predictions for carcass and reproduction traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korea.
    Iqbal A; Choi TJ; Kim YS; Lee YM; Zahangir Alam M; Jung JH; Choe HS; Kim JJ
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 32(11):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 31480201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Animal board invited review: The purebred-crossbred genetic correlation in poultry.
    Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bos J; Duenk P
    Animal; 2023 Nov; 17(11):100997. PubMed ID: 37820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Longevity and lifetime reproductive trait genetic parameter estimates from Thai Landrace and Large White pig populations.
    Plaengkaeo S; Duangjinda M; Stalder KJ
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2021 May; 53(2):319. PubMed ID: 33987746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Reproductive performance of purebred landrace and Yorkshire sows in Thailand with special reference to seasonal influence and parity number.
    Tantasuparuk W; Lundeheim N; Dalin AM; Kunavongkrit A; Einarsson S
    Theriogenology; 2000 Aug; 54(3):481-96. PubMed ID: 11051330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Genetic evaluation combining purebred and crossbred data in a pig breeding scheme.
    Ibáñez-Escriche N; Reixach J; Lleonart N; Noguera JL
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3881-9. PubMed ID: 21841081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Total cost estimation for implementing genome-enabled selection in a multi-level swine production system.
    Abell CE; Dekkers JC; Rothschild MF; Mabry JW; Stalder KJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 May; 46(1):32. PubMed ID: 24885089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Estimation of direct and maternal genetic variance for litter size in Canadian Yorkshire and Landrace swine using an animal model.
    Southwood OI; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Jul; 68(7):1841-7. PubMed ID: 2384377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Genetic diversity, extent of linkage disequilibrium and persistence of gametic phase in Canadian pigs.
    Grossi DA; Jafarikia M; Brito LF; Buzanskas ME; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 28109261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. II. Reproductive performance of purebred females producing purebred and two-way cross litters and performance of purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 6674283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Estimation of Genetic Parameters and Trends for Length of Productive Life and Lifetime Production Traits in a Commercial Landrace and Yorkshire Swine Population in Northern Thailand.
    Noppibool U; Elzo MA; Koonawootrittriron S; Suwanasopee T
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1222-8. PubMed ID: 26954115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Predicting the impact of genotype-by-genotype interaction on the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from phenotype and genotype marker data of parental lines.
    Duenk P; Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Iversen MW; Lopes MS; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jan; 55(1):2. PubMed ID: 36639760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Bradford HL; Gray KA; Huang Y; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5004-5013. PubMed ID: 28046178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Selection for litter size and litter birthweight in Large White pigs: Maximum, mean and variability of reproduction traits.
    Sell-Kubiak E
    Animal; 2021 Oct; 15(10):100352. PubMed ID: 34534762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effect of candidate gene polymorphisms on reproductive traits in a Large White pig population.
    Sato S; Kikuchi T; Uemoto Y; Mikawa S; Suzuki K
    Anim Sci J; 2016 Dec; 87(12):1455-1463. PubMed ID: 27018129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of large white and Landrace swine.
    Ferraz JB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 8478287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2104-14. PubMed ID: 17504955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.