These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34559250)

  • 1. The codification of hazard and its impact on the hazard versus risk controversy.
    Doe JE; Boobis AR; Cohen SM; Dellarco VL; Fenner-Crisp PA; Moretto A; Pastoor TP; Schoeny RS; Seed JG; Wolf DC
    Arch Toxicol; 2021 Nov; 95(11):3611-3621. PubMed ID: 34559250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating potency into EU classification for carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity.
    Hennes C; Batke M; Bomann W; Duhayon S; Kosemund K; Politano V; Stinchcombe S; Doe J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Nov; 70(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 25092129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hazard banding in compliance with the new Globally Harmonised System (GHS) for use in control banding tools.
    Arnone M; Koppisch D; Smola T; Gabriel S; Verbist K; Visser R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Oct; 73(1):287-95. PubMed ID: 26206396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated testing strategies for use in the EU REACH system.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):407-27. PubMed ID: 16945008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Strength and Validity of Hazard Banding.
    Scheffers T; Doornaert B; Berne N; van Breukelen G; Leplay A; van Miert E
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Nov; 60(9):1049-1061. PubMed ID: 27621219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regulatory issues in management of chemicals in OECD member countries.
    Kleandrova VV; Speck-Planche A
    Front Biosci (Elite Ed); 2013 Jan; 5(1):375-98. PubMed ID: 23276996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prioritization of reproductive toxicants in unconventional oil and gas operations using a multi-country regulatory data-driven hazard assessment.
    Inayat-Hussain SH; Fukumura M; Muiz Aziz A; Jin CM; Jin LW; Garcia-Milian R; Vasiliou V; Deziel NC
    Environ Int; 2018 Aug; 117():348-358. PubMed ID: 29793188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A regulatory approach to assess the potency of substances toxic to the reproduction.
    Muller A; Blaude MN; Ihlemann C; Bjorge C; Ohlsson A; Gebel T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jun; 63(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 22410176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development of the globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals.
    Winder C; Azzi R; Wagner D
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Oct; 125(1-3):29-44. PubMed ID: 16039045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of mandatory and voluntary approaches to the implementation of Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) in the management of hazardous chemicals.
    Ta GC; Mokhtar MB; Peterson PJ; Yahaya NB
    Ind Health; 2011; 49(6):765-73. PubMed ID: 22020020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The European Community Directive on the classification and labeling of chemicals for reproductive toxicity.
    Sullivan FM
    J Occup Environ Med; 1995 Aug; 37(8):966-9. PubMed ID: 8520962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transformation/dissolution characteristics of a nickel matte and nickel concentrates for acute and chronic hazard classification.
    Skeaff JM; Beaudoin R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jan; 11(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 25103894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A GHS-consistent approach to health hazard classification of petroleum substances, a class of UVCB substances.
    Clark CR; McKee RH; Freeman JJ; Swick D; Mahagaokar S; Pigram G; Roberts LG; Smulders CJ; Beatty PW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 24025648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical aspects in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing of environmental chemicals.
    Buschmann J
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Aug; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16782303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of approaches for terrestrial hazard classification.
    Renaud FG; Boxall AB; Toy R; Robertson S
    Chemosphere; 2004 Dec; 57(11):1697-706. PubMed ID: 15519416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Global harmonisation of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals.
    Pratt IS
    Toxicol Lett; 2002 Mar; 128(1-3):5-15. PubMed ID: 11869813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Assessment of the Robustness of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) Target Airborne Concentration Ranges 15 Years on, and Their Usefulness for Determining Control Measures.
    Vaughan NP; Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah R
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Apr; 61(3):270-283. PubMed ID: 28355421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicted no effect concentration derivation as a significant source of variability in environmental hazard assessments of chemicals in aquatic systems: an international analysis.
    Hahn T; Diamond J; Dobson S; Howe P; Kielhorn J; Koennecker G; Lee-Steere C; Mangelsdorf I; Schneider U; Sugaya Y; Taylor K; Dam RV; Stauber JL
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23913910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A proposal to improve clarity and communication in the EU Classification process for chemicals for carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity.
    Doe JE
    J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Oct; 34(10):1068-72. PubMed ID: 25059745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aligning chemical assessment tools across the hazard-risk continuum.
    Pittinger CA; Brennan TH; Badger DA; Hakkinen PJ; Fehrenbacher MC
    Risk Anal; 2003 Jun; 23(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 12836845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.