172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34559891)
1. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015.
Xia L; Talwar R; Taylor BL; Shin MH; Berger IB; Sperling CD; Chelluri RR; Zambrano IA; Raman JD; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):182.e17-182.e27. PubMed ID: 30630732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Barriers to laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: a national analysis.
Hawkins AT; Ford MM; Benjamin Hopkins M; Muldoon RL; Wanderer JP; Parikh AA; Geiger TM
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 28840352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.
Lee L; Wong-Chong N; Kelly JJ; Nassif GJ; Albert MR; Monson JRT
Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):460-470. PubMed ID: 29967992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
