These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34559891)

  • 1. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
    Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
    Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
    Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015.
    Xia L; Talwar R; Taylor BL; Shin MH; Berger IB; Sperling CD; Chelluri RR; Zambrano IA; Raman JD; Guzzo TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):182.e17-182.e27. PubMed ID: 30630732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
    Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
    Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Racial disparities in access to minimally invasive proctectomy for rectal cancer-a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study.
    Nasseri YY; La KH; Oka K; Solis-Pazmino P; Smiley A; Langenfeld S; Cohen J; Barnajian M
    Colorectal Dis; 2024 Jun; 26(6):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 38702908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
    Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
    J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
    Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
    Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
    Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
    J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Barriers to laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: a national analysis.
    Hawkins AT; Ford MM; Benjamin Hopkins M; Muldoon RL; Wanderer JP; Parikh AA; Geiger TM
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 28840352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
    Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.
    Lee L; Wong-Chong N; Kelly JJ; Nassif GJ; Albert MR; Monson JRT
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):460-470. PubMed ID: 29967992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
    Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.