164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34560179)
1. Semi-correlations as a tool to model for skin sensitization.
Toropova AP; Toropov AA; Benfenati E
Food Chem Toxicol; 2021 Nov; 157():112580. PubMed ID: 34560179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction.
Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():118-124. PubMed ID: 28602621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.
Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N
J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.
Hirota M; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Takenouchi O; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1333-47. PubMed ID: 25824844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.
Strickland J; Zang Q; Kleinstreuer N; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Lowit A; Allen D; Casey W
J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1150-62. PubMed ID: 26851134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The correlation of haptenation of gold nanoparticles and cysteine modified screen printed carbon electrode by impedance technique with local lymph node assay data.
Noh TU; Aziz AA
Toxicol In Vitro; 2022 Oct; 84():105433. PubMed ID: 35817266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of skin sensitization induced by four ionic liquids.
Frawley RP; Germolec DR; Johnson VJ; Gulledge T; Manheng W; White K; Shockley KR; Harris SF; Hooth M; Ryan K
J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Mar; 42(3):392-408. PubMed ID: 34453447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstructed human epidermis-based testing strategy of skin sensitization potential and potency classification using epidermal sensitization assay and in silico data.
Mizumachi H; Suzuki S; Sakuma M; Natsui M; Imai N; Miyazawa M
J Appl Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 44(3):415-427. PubMed ID: 37846211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peptide reactivity associated with skin sensitization: The QSAR Toolbox and TIMES compared to the DPRA.
Urbisch D; Honarvar N; Kolle SN; Mehling A; Ramirez T; Teubner W; Landsiedel R
Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Aug; 34():194-203. PubMed ID: 27090964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of dermal sensitization potential for industrial or agricultural chemicals with EpiSensA.
Mizumachi H; LeBaron MJ; Settivari RS; Miyazawa M; Marty MS; Sakaguchi H
J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):915-927. PubMed ID: 33124094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the local lymph node assay in the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of pharmaceutical process intermediates.
Durand G; de Burlet G; Virat M; Nauman BD
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Sep; 49(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 14678211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Basketter DA; Lea L; Blaikie L; Dearman RJ; Warbrick EV; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 10945748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitization properties of acetophenone azine, a new skin sensitizer identified in textile.
Manière I; Aubert A; Dubois C; Solal C; Lepoittevin JP; Rousselle C
Contact Dermatitis; 2023 Jan; 88(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 36074825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?
Patlewicz G; Casati S; Basketter DA; Asturiol D; Roberts DW; Lepoittevin JP; Worth AP; Aschberger K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():147-155. PubMed ID: 27569201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
Nukada Y; Miyazawa M; Kazutoshi S; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Mar; 27(2):609-18. PubMed ID: 23149339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduced specificity for the local lymph node assay for lipophilic chemicals: Implications for the validation of new approach methods for skin sensitization.
Natsch A; Kleinstreuer N; Asturiol D
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Feb; 138():105333. PubMed ID: 36608925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
