These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3456048)

  • 1. Comparison of mandibular movements recorded by two pantographs.
    Donaldson K; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jan; 55(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 3456048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observations on the use of the Denar pantograph and articulator.
    Winstanley RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Dec; 38(6):660-72. PubMed ID: 271716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part II: Results.
    Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Stern N; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 2724155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of the variability of setting a fully adjustable gnathologic articulator to a pantographic tracing.
    Coye RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Apr; 37(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 265402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of lateral interocclusal records to pantographic tracings.
    Curtis DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jul; 62(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2746537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Do pin guides have any effect on the limits of mandibular movements?].
    Koeck B; Severin B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1977 Mar; 32(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 265263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part I: Methodology.
    Stern N; Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 3172004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of the lateral condylar adjustment of nonarcon semiadjustable articulators.
    Taylor TD; Huber LR; Aquilino SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Jul; 54(1):140-3. PubMed ID: 3860652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a digitizer and computer system designed to analyze articulator-generated occlusal tracings.
    Kolling JN; Price RB; Miller RL; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Apr; 59(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 3162997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Errors incurred in programming a fully adjustable articulator with a pantograph.
    Curtis DA; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Apr; 55(4):427-9. PubMed ID: 3457176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings.
    Price RB; Bannerman RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3172002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproduction ofarticulator settings and movements with an ultrasonic jaw movement recorder.
    Baker PJ; Setchell DJ; Tredwin CJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 16808105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of TMJ dysfunction on Bennett movement as recorded by a modified pantograph. Part II: Pilot articulator study.
    Simonet PF; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Nov; 46(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 6946222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new semiadjustable articulator. Part III. An investigation of the capability of the Hanau XP-51 articulator.
    Finger IM; Tanaka H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Mar; 37(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 264967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technique for transferring information from a pantograph tracing to semiadjustable articulators.
    Gordon SR; Stoffer WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 3862808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Procedural problems in using the Denar pantograph as a transfer-bow.
    Beck DB; Kass CA; Knap FJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Feb; 39(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 271731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of protrusive interocclusal records to pantographic tracings.
    Curtis DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 2668509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of an electronic and a mechanical pantograph. Part I: Consistency of an electronic computerized pantograph to record articulator settings.
    Beard CC; Donaldson K; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):570-4. PubMed ID: 3458908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandibular movement recordings and articulator adjustments simplified.
    Lundeen HC
    Dent Clin North Am; 1979 Apr; 23(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 285900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators.
    Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.