These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34560686)

  • 1. Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia: A prospective randomised controlled trial.
    Klabusayová E; Klučka J; Kosinová M; Ťoukálková M; Štoudek R; Kratochvíl M; Mareček L; Svoboda M; Jabandžiev P; Urík M; Štourač P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2021 Nov; 38(11):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 34560686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.
    Sulser S; Ubmann D; Schlaepfer M; Brueesch M; Goliasch G; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates).
    Abdelgadir IS; Phillips RS; Singh D; Moncreiff MP; Lumsden JL
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011413. PubMed ID: 28539007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anaesthesia protocol evaluation of the videolaryngoscopy with the McGrath MAC and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in 1000 patients undergoing rapid sequence induction: the randomised multicentre LARA trial study protocol.
    Kriege M; Lang P; Lang C; Pirlich N; Griemert EV; Heid F; Wittenmeier E; Schmidtmann I; Schmidbauer W; Jänig C; Jungbecker J; Kunitz O; Strate M; Schmutz A
    BMJ Open; 2021 Oct; 11(10):e052977. PubMed ID: 34615684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the McGrath videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in the operating theatre: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Kriege M; Lang P; Lang C; Schmidtmann I; Kunitz O; Roth M; Strate M; Schmutz A; Vits E; Balogh O; Jänig C
    Anaesthesia; 2024 Aug; 79(8):801-809. PubMed ID: 38345268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates.
    Lingappan K; Arnold JL; Fernandes CJ; Pammi M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD009975. PubMed ID: 29862490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multicentre randomised controlled trial of the McGrath™ Mac videolaryngoscope versus conventional laryngoscopy.
    Kriege M; Noppens RR; Turkstra T; Payne S; Kunitz O; Tzanova I; Schmidtmann I;
    Anaesthesia; 2023 Jun; 78(6):722-729. PubMed ID: 36928625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct versus video laryngoscopy with standard blades for neonatal and infant tracheal intubation with supplemental oxygen: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.
    Riva T; Engelhardt T; Basciani R; Bonfiglio R; Cools E; Fuchs A; Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG; Greif R; Habre W; Huber M; Petre MA; von Ungern-Sternberg BS; Sommerfield D; Theiler L; Disma N;
    Lancet Child Adolesc Health; 2023 Feb; 7(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 36436541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First pass success of tracheal intubation using the C-MAC PM videolaryngoscope as first-line device in prehospital cardiac arrest compared with other emergencies: An observational study.
    Hossfeld B; Thierbach S; Allgoewer A; Gaessler H; Helm M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2021 Aug; 38(8):806-812. PubMed ID: 32833853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population.
    Aziz MF; Abrons RO; Cattano D; Bayman EO; Swanson DE; Hagberg CA; Todd MM; Brambrink AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Mar; 122(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 26579847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in paediatric intubation: A meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials.
    Hu X; Jin Y; Li J; Xin J; Yang Z
    J Clin Anesth; 2020 Nov; 66():109968. PubMed ID: 32645564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Ruetzler K; Bustamante S; Schmidt MT; Almonacid-Cardenas F; Duncan A; Bauer A; Turan A; Skubas NJ; Sessler DI;
    JAMA; 2024 Apr; 331(15):1279-1286. PubMed ID: 38497992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in children who are difficult to intubate: an analysis from the paediatric difficult intubation registry.
    Park R; Peyton JM; Fiadjoe JE; Hunyady AI; Kimball T; Zurakowski D; Kovatsis PG; ;
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 119(5):984-992. PubMed ID: 29028952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Howle R; Onwochei D; Harrison SL; Desai N
    Can J Anaesth; 2021 Apr; 68(4):546-565. PubMed ID: 33438172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applied forces with direct versus indirect laryngoscopy in neonatal intubation: a randomized crossover mannequin study.
    Cavallin F; Sala C; Maglio S; Bua B; Villani PE; Menciassi A; Tognarelli S; Trevisanuto D
    Can J Anaesth; 2023 May; 70(5):861-868. PubMed ID: 36788198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Videolaryngoscopy vs. flexible fibrescopy for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: a randomised controlled trial.
    Choi S; Yoo HK; Shin KW; Kim YJ; Yoon HK; Park HP; Oh H
    Anaesthesia; 2023 Aug; 78(8):970-978. PubMed ID: 37145935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the success rate of tracheal intubation between stylet and bougie with a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope: a randomised controlled trial.
    Eum D; Ji YJ; Kim HJ
    Anaesthesia; 2024 Jun; 79(6):603-610. PubMed ID: 38114306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review.
    Lewis SR; Butler AR; Parker J; Cook TM; Schofield-Robinson OJ; Smith AF
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Sep; 119(3):369-383. PubMed ID: 28969318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vie Scope® versus videolaryngoscopy in expected difficult airways: a randomized controlled trial.
    Petzoldt M; Grün C; Wünsch VA; Bauer M; Hardel TT; Grensemann J
    Can J Anaesth; 2023 Sep; 70(9):1486-1494. PubMed ID: 37537324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.