These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Comparison of Home-Blenderized Formula and Commercial Enteral Formulas for Gastrostomy Tube-Fed Children: A Retrospective, Prospective Cohort Study. Shrager S; Adigun A; Motolongo S; Santos CS; Rowe-King P; Duro D Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37944. PubMed ID: 37220453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health Outcomes and Quality of Life Indices of Children Receiving Blenderized Feeds via Enteral Tube. Hron B; Fishman E; Lurie M; Clarke T; Chin Z; Hester L; Burch E; Rosen R J Pediatr; 2019 Aug; 211():139-145.e1. PubMed ID: 31128885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fundoplication and gastrostomy versus image-guided gastrojejunal tube for enteral feeding in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux. Wales PW; Diamond IR; Dutta S; Muraca S; Chait P; Connolly B; Langer JC J Pediatr Surg; 2002 Mar; 37(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 11877658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enteral nutrition by tube feeding in adults. Mohandas KM; Shastri YM; Shirodkar M Natl Med J India; 2001; 14(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 11767223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fibre content of enteral feeds for the older child. Evans S; Daly A; Davies P; MacDonald A J Hum Nutr Diet; 2009 Oct; 22(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 19743979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parental Reports on Gastrostomy Tube Feeds: Blenderized Versus Nonblenderized Formula. Cruz-Centeno N; Fraser JA; Stewart S; Oyetunji TA; St Peter SD; Hendrickson RJ Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2024 Jun; 63(5):608-612. PubMed ID: 37548416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective review of enteral nutrition support practices at a tertiary pediatric hospital: A comparison of prolonged nasogastric and gastrostomy tube feeding. Ricciuto A; Baird R; Sant'Anna A Clin Nutr; 2015 Aug; 34(4):652-8. PubMed ID: 25074015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reemergence of Blenderized Tube Feedings: Exploring the Evidence. Bobo E Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 31(6):730-735. PubMed ID: 27646862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased Force Required With Proposed Standardized Enteral Feed Connector in Blenderized Tube Feeding. Mundi MS; Epp L; Hurt RT Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 31(6):795-798. PubMed ID: 27091746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]