These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34561095)

  • 21. Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.
    Revilla-León M; Gonzalez-Martín Ó; Pérez López J; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Özcan M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):560-567. PubMed ID: 29148121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies.
    Yilmaz B; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Cuellar AR; de Paula MS; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1318.e1-1318.e9. PubMed ID: 36435670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II - conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study.
    Chebib N; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Maniewicz S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):618-625. PubMed ID: 36055812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Hwang HJ; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Yoon HI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Quantitative evaluation of fabricating complete denture by computer numerical control in manufacturing dentition and baseplate separately plus adhesive molding].
    Wang H; Lv PJ; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):884-888. PubMed ID: 27752175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques.
    Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Baba NZ; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 27112416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of CAD-CAM-fabricated removable partial dentures.
    Arnold C; Hey J; Schweyen R; Setz JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):586-592. PubMed ID: 28709674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Trueness of 3-dimensionally printed complete arch implant analog casts.
    Gagnon-Audet A; An H; Jensen UF; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37558526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative analysis of denture base adaptation performance between pour and other conventional fabrication techniques.
    Akaltan F; Batak B; Oguz EI; Orhan K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):183.e1-183.e5. PubMed ID: 31767202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of digital and conventional methods of fit evaluation of partial removable dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting.
    Alabdullah SA; Hannam AG; Wyatt CC; McCullagh APG; Aleksejuniene J; Mostafa NZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):478.e1-478.e10. PubMed ID: 35221036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques.
    Tosun ON; Bilmenoglu C; Özdemir AK
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e64-e70. PubMed ID: 36495146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
    Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases.
    Song S; Zhang J; Liu M; Li F; Bai S
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104435. PubMed ID: 36693587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of ridge lap accuracy and adaptation of the diagnostic tooth arrangement fabricated with CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study.
    You SM; You SG; Jeon JH; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):487-493. PubMed ID: 35305834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Pure titanium denture large-span frameworks additively manufactured with selective laser melting].
    Luo XP; Wei YX; Huang HN; Hu DD; Pang EL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 56(7):646-651. PubMed ID: 34275219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CAD-CAM milled versus rapidly prototyped (3D-printed) complete dentures: An in vitro evaluation of trueness.
    Kalberer N; Mehl A; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):637-643. PubMed ID: 30711292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology.
    McLaughlin JB; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):428-435. PubMed ID: 29136309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.