These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34561095)

  • 41. Dimensional changes of complete dentures fabricated by milled and printed techniques: An in vitro study.
    Tsai FC; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Apr; 129(4):608-615. PubMed ID: 34364688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Generation and evaluation of 3D digital casts of maxillary defects based on multisource data registration: A pilot clinical study.
    Ye H; Ma Q; Hou Y; Li M; Zhou Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):790-795. PubMed ID: 28449864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Marginal accuracy and internal fit of machine-milled and cast titanium crowns.
    Han HS; Yang HS; Lim HP; Park YJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 21889006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of relining method on dimensional accuracy of posterior palatal seal. An in vitro study.
    Kim Y; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 18194207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of base design on the manufacturing accuracy of vat-polymerized diagnostic casts: An in vitro study.
    Revilla-León M; Piedra-Cascón W; Aragoneses R; Sadeghpour M; Barmak BA; Zandinejad A; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 34119320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts.
    Yousef H; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 33785200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dimensional accuracy of microcomputed tomography-scanned half-arch impressions.
    Kerr M; Park N; Leeson D; Nikolskiy S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):797-802. PubMed ID: 30617030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of anchorage on the accuracy of fit in removable partial denture framework.
    Gowri V; Patil NP; Nadiger RK; Guttal SS
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):387-90. PubMed ID: 20456025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts.
    Jang Y; Sim JY; Park JK; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 31027960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of a new tension system, used in acrylic resin flasking, on the dimensional stability of denture bases.
    Consani RL; Domitti SS; Consani S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 12426498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
    Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
    Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Implant Impression Approach: A Three-Dimensional Comparative In Vitro Analysis.
    Basaki K; Alkumru H; De Souza G; Finer Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):792–799. PubMed ID: 28618432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of the Adaptation of Complete Dentures Fabricated Using Intraoral Scanning and Conventional Techniques.
    Masri G; Mortada R; Hatoum K; Al Harbi N; Boulos P; Salameh Z
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1384-1388. PubMed ID: 33893263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures.
    Yoshidome K; Torii M; Kawamura N; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct; 65(4):559-564. PubMed ID: 33980786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dimensional changes of one-piece frameworks cast from titanium, base metal, or noble metal alloys and supported on telescopic crowns.
    Gebelein M; Richter G; Range U; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12616241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
    de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the adaptation of complete denture metal bases fabricated with dental CAD-CAM systems: An in vitro study.
    You SG; You SM; Kang SY; Bae SY; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):479-485. PubMed ID: 32276824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accuracy of Digitally Fabricated Wax Denture Bases and Conventional Completed Complete Dentures.
    Stawarczyk B; Lümkemann N; Eichberger M; Wimmer T
    Dent J (Basel); 2017 Dec; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 29563442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.