These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34561303)

  • 1. How top-down and bottom-up attention modulate risky choice.
    Vanunu Y; Hotaling JM; Le Pelley ME; Newell BR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(39):. PubMed ID: 34561303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
    Long NM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 29437930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disentangling the Role of Cortico-Basal Ganglia Loops in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Visual Attention: An Investigation of Attention Deficits in Parkinson Disease.
    Tommasi G; Fiorio M; Yelnik J; Krack P; Sala F; Schmitt E; Fraix V; Bertolasi L; Le Bas JF; Ricciardi GK; Fiaschi A; Theeuwes J; Pollak P; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1215-37. PubMed ID: 25514652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Affective salience can reverse the effects of stimulus-driven salience on eye movements in complex scenes.
    Niu Y; Todd RM; Anderson AK
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():336. PubMed ID: 23055990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Top-down knowledge modulates onset capture in a feedforward manner.
    Becker SI; Lewis AJ; Axtens JE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):436-446. PubMed ID: 27535753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search.
    van Zoest W; Donk M
    Perception; 2004; 33(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 15521692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions between top-down and bottom-up attention in barn owls (Tyto alba).
    Lev-Ari T; Gutfreund Y
    Anim Cogn; 2018 Mar; 21(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 29214438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The order of information processing alters economic gain-loss framing effects.
    Kwak Y; Huettel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():46-54. PubMed ID: 29136516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection.
    van Zoest W; Donk M; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):746-59. PubMed ID: 15305440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Top-down control of attention under varying task loads.
    Jo S; Kim JY; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 May; 216():103310. PubMed ID: 33892264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top-Down Beta Enhances Bottom-Up Gamma.
    Richter CG; Thompson WH; Bosman CA; Fries P
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(28):6698-6711. PubMed ID: 28592697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.
    Mazaheri A; DiQuattro NE; Bengson J; Geng JJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16243. PubMed ID: 21386896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation.
    Goschy H; Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 24323673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of salience are both short- and long-lived.
    Orquin JL; Lagerkvist CJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():69-76. PubMed ID: 26188691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task frequency influences stimulus-driven effects on task selection during voluntary task switching.
    Arrington CM; Reiman KM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1089-95. PubMed ID: 26106057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elucidating the differential impact of extreme-outcomes in perceptual and preferential choice.
    Vanunu Y; Hotaling JM; Newell BR
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Jun; 119():101274. PubMed ID: 32062088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience.
    Thompson KG; Bichot NP; Sato TR
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 93(1):337-51. PubMed ID: 15317836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.