These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. The attractiveness of salient distractors to reaching movements is task dependent. Nissens T; Fiehler K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2502-2515. PubMed ID: 32026449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Testing the role of temporal selection for stimulus-driven capture of attention. Pomper U; Duss C; Ansorge U Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108141. PubMed ID: 36410264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors. Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. P Drisdelle BL; Eimer M Psychophysiology; 2021 Sep; 58(9):e13878. PubMed ID: 34110022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target. Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Awareness and Stimulus-Driven Spatial Attention as Independent Processes. Baier D; Goller F; Ansorge U Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():352. PubMed ID: 32982706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations. Won BY; Kosoyan M; Geng JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 30596437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs. Wykowska A; Schubö A J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Sawaki R; Luck SJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1455-70. PubMed ID: 20675793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task. van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Suppression of salient stimuli inside the focus of attention. Kerzel D; Barras C; Grubert A Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():106-114. PubMed ID: 30392825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture. Failing M; Theeuwes J Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]