These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34561872)

  • 1. Simultaneous use of high-volume Foley catheter (60 ml) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized controlled trial.
    Soni A; Sharma A; Sharma C; Verma S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Jul; 158(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 34561872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sharma C; Jaryal S; Soni A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101026. PubMed ID: 37211088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
    Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
    Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of combination of transcervical Foley catheter and sublingual misoprostol versus sublingual misoprostol for labor induction in pre-eclampsia at 28-34 weeks.
    Sharma J; Sagili H; Keepanasseril A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 May; 161(2):432-438. PubMed ID: 36151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
    Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
    Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized trial of Foley balloon induction of labor trial in nulliparas (FIAT-N).
    Connolly KA; Kohari KS; Rekawek P; Smilen BS; Miller MR; Moshier E; Factor SH; Stone JL; Bianco AT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):392.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27018464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations.
    Kandil M; Emarh M; Sayyed T; Masood A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Aug; 286(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 22434058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez Slagle HB; Fonge YN; Caplan R; Pfeuti CK; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 226(5):724.e1-724.e9. PubMed ID: 35135684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foley catheter vs prostaglandin as ripening agent in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes.
    Mackeen AD; Walker L; Ruhstaller K; Schuster M; Sciscione A
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Sep; 114(9):686-92. PubMed ID: 25170038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction.
    Chavakula PR; Benjamin SJ; Abraham A; Londhe V; Jeyaseelan V; Mathews JE
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 May; 129(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 25661322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Mundle S; Bracken H; Khedikar V; Mulik J; Faragher B; Easterling T; Leigh S; Granby P; Haycox A; Turner MA; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks AD
    Lancet; 2017 Aug; 390(10095):669-680. PubMed ID: 28668289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.