167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34562341)
1. Determining the longitudinal accuracy and reproducibility of T
Carr ME; Keenan KE; Rai R; Metcalfe P; Walker A; Holloway L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 22(11):143-150. PubMed ID: 34562341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative imaging metrics derived from magnetic resonance fingerprinting using ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom: An international multicenter repeatability and reproducibility study.
Shridhar Konar A; Qian E; Geethanath S; Buonincontri G; Obuchowski NA; Fung M; Gomez P; Schulte R; Cencini M; Tosetti M; Schwartz LH; Shukla-Dave A
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2438-2447. PubMed ID: 33690905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive Evaluation of B
Kato Y; Ichikawa K; Okudaira K; Taoka T; Kawaguchi H; Murata K; Maruyama K; Koerzdoerfer G; Pfeuffer J; Nittka M; Naganawa S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Aug; 19(3):168-175. PubMed ID: 31217366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temperature dependence, accuracy, and repeatability of T
Statton BK; Smith J; Finnegan ME; Koerzdoerfer G; Quest RA; Grech-Sollars M
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1446-1460. PubMed ID: 34752644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of magnetic resonance fingerprinting T
Jiang Y; Ma D; Keenan KE; Stupic KF; Gulani V; Griswold MA
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Oct; 78(4):1452-1457. PubMed ID: 27790751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS): an automated open-source tool for the ISMRM/NIST system phantom.
Korte JC; Chin Z; Carr M; Holloway L; Franich R
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(6):. PubMed ID: 36796102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tailored magnetic resonance fingerprinting for simultaneous non-synthetic and quantitative imaging: A repeatability study.
Qian E; Poojar P; Vaughan JT; Jin Z; Geethanath S
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1673-1685. PubMed ID: 35084744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy, repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T
Bane O; Hectors SJ; Wagner M; Arlinghaus LL; Aryal MP; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Fennessy F; Huang W; Hylton NM; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Keenan KE; Malyarenko DI; Mulkern RV; Newitt DC; Russek SE; Stupic KF; Tudorica A; Wilmes LJ; Yankeelov TE; Yen YF; Boss MA; Taouli B
Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2564-2575. PubMed ID: 28913930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing effects of scanner upgrades for clinical studies.
Keenan KE; Gimbutas Z; Dienstfrey A; Stupic KF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Dec; 50(6):1948-1954. PubMed ID: 31111981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. T1 relaxation time of ISMRM/NIST T1 phantom spheres at 7 T.
Yen YF; Stupic KF; Janicke MT; Greve DN; Mareyam A; Stockmann J; Polimeni JR; van der Kouwe A; Keenan KE
NMR Biomed; 2023 May; 36(5):e4873. PubMed ID: 36347826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of T
Wicaksono KP; Fushimi Y; Nakajima S; Sakata A; Okuchi S; Hinoda T; Oshima S; Otani S; Tagawa H; Urushibata Y; Nakamoto Y
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2895-2904. PubMed ID: 36422648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-site, multi-platform comparison of MRI T1 measurement using the system phantom.
Keenan KE; Gimbutas Z; Dienstfrey A; Stupic KF; Boss MA; Russek SE; Chenevert TL; Prasad PV; Guo J; Reddick WE; Cecil KM; Shukla-Dave A; Aramburu Nunez D; Shridhar Konar A; Liu MZ; Jambawalikar SR; Schwartz LH; Zheng J; Hu P; Jackson EF
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252966. PubMed ID: 34191819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative MRI: Defining repeatability, reproducibility and accuracy for prostate cancer imaging biomarker development.
Wang Y; Tadimalla S; Rai R; Goodwin J; Foster S; Liney G; Holloway L; Haworth A
Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Apr; 77():169-179. PubMed ID: 33388362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing a medical device-grade T
Topriceanu CC; Fornasiero M; Seo H; Webber M; Keenan KE; Stupic KF; Bruehl R; Ittermann B; Price K; McGrath L; Pang W; Hughes AD; Nezafat R; Kellman P; Pierce I; Moon JC; Captur G
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Mar; 25(1):19. PubMed ID: 36935515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring water content using T2 relaxation at 3T: Phantom validations and simulations.
Meyers SM; Kolind SH; Laule C; MacKay AL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 34(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26657977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners.
Raman FS; Kawel-Boehm N; Gai N; Freed M; Han J; Liu CY; Lima JA; Bluemke DA; Liu S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jul; 15(1):64. PubMed ID: 23890156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of T
Malmberg MA; Odéen H; Parker DL
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2396-2412. PubMed ID: 35066898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid multicontrast brain imaging on a 0.35T MR-linac.
Nejad-Davarani SP; Zakariaei N; Chen Y; Haacke EM; Hurst NJ; Salim Siddiqui M; Schultz LR; Snyder JM; Walbert T; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4064-4076. PubMed ID: 32434276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative MRI using STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE): optimization for 1.5 T scanners and T1 relaxation map validation.
Pirastru A; Chen Y; Pelizzari L; Baglio F; Clerici M; Haacke EM; Laganà MM
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4504-4513. PubMed ID: 33409790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reference ranges of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in healthy Chinese adults: a multicenter 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
Xu Z; Li W; Wang J; Wang F; Sun B; Xiang S; Luo X; Meng Y; Wang X; Wang X; Song J; Zhang M; Xu D; Zhou X; Ju Z; Sun J; Han Y; Chen Y
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Nov; 25(1):64. PubMed ID: 37968645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
