170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34562623)
1. The dynamic optotype (Dyop): a novel visual acuity test for use in children.
Barnett-Itzhaki G; Barnett-Itzhaki Z; Ela-Dalman N
J AAPOS; 2021 Oct; 25(5):285.e1-285.e5. PubMed ID: 34562623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The handy eye chart: a new visual acuity test for use in children.
Cromelin CH; Candy TR; Lynn MJ; Harrington CL; Hutchinson AK
Ophthalmology; 2012 Oct; 119(10):2009-13. PubMed ID: 22796307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.
Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Miller JM; Garvey KA; Harvey EM
J AAPOS; 2009 Jun; 13(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 19345596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the DYOP visual acuity test.
Gantz L; Paritzky D; Wunch I; Kageyama AH; Wolf N; Cherny C; Rosenfield M
J Optom; 2023; 16(4):268-276. PubMed ID: 36400682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing distance visual acuity measurement with a novel eye chart and the Landolt C chart in a population of children aged 6-18 years.
Gorham JP; Bruce BB; Hutchinson AK
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 37(6):1345-1348. PubMed ID: 27826937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults.
Sapkota A; Sitaula S; Shrestha GS; Joshi ND; Koirala B; Paudel N
J Optom; 2023; 16(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 36717317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual acuity results in school-aged children and adults: Lea Symbols chart versus Bailey-Lovie chart.
Dobson V; Maguire M; Orel-Bixler D; Quinn G; Ying GS;
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 80(9):650-4. PubMed ID: 14502046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork.
Bastawrous A; Rono HK; Livingstone IA; Weiss HA; Jordan S; Kuper H; Burton MJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel smartphone App to support the clinical practice of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus: the validation of visual acuity tests.
Racano E; Malfatti G; Pertile R; Delle Site R; Romanelli F; Nicolini A
Eur J Pediatr; 2023 Sep; 182(9):4007-4013. PubMed ID: 37386193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a Home-Printable Vision Screening Test for Telemedicine.
Crossland MD; Dekker TM; Hancox J; Lisi M; Wemyss TA; Thomas PBM
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2021 Mar; 139(3):271-277. PubMed ID: 33410910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Visual Acuity Measured by Lea Symbols and Patti Pics.
Singman EL; Matta NS; Tian J; Silbert DI
Am Orthopt J; 2015; 65():94-8. PubMed ID: 26564933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Handy Eye Check: a mobile medical application to test visual acuity in children.
Toner KN; Lynn MJ; Candy TR; Hutchinson AK
J AAPOS; 2014 Jun; 18(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 24924280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart.
Sanker N; Dhirani S; Bhakat P
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 24339687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters.
McVeigh EM; Ludden SM; Mohamed S; Shah N; Mulholland PJ; Dahlmann-Noor A
Eye (Lond); 2022 Dec; 36(12):2341-2345. PubMed ID: 34987195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normative monocular visual acuity for early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts in emmetropic children 5 to 12 years of age.
Dobson V; Clifford-Donaldson CE; Green TK; Miller JM; Harvey EM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1397-401. PubMed ID: 19427702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
