165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34563654)
1. Machine learning methods for prediction of food effects on bioavailability: A comparison of support vector machines and artificial neural networks.
Bennett-Lenane H; Griffin BT; O'Shea JP
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2022 Jan; 168():106018. PubMed ID: 34563654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of the generalised predictive ability of eight machine learning algorithms across ten clinical metabolomics data sets for binary classification.
Mendez KM; Reinke SN; Broadhurst DI
Metabolomics; 2019 Nov; 15(12):150. PubMed ID: 31728648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioactivity Comparison across Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms Using over 5000 Datasets for Drug Discovery.
Lane TR; Foil DH; Minerali E; Urbina F; Zorn KM; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2021 Jan; 18(1):403-415. PubMed ID: 33325717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transferability of artificial neural networks for clinical document classification across hospitals: A case study on abnormality detection from radiology reports.
Hassanzadeh H; Nguyen A; Karimi S; Chu K
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Sep; 85():68-79. PubMed ID: 30026067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural network and support vector machine for the prediction of chronic kidney disease: A comparative study.
Almansour NA; Syed HF; Khayat NR; Altheeb RK; Juri RE; Alhiyafi J; Alrashed S; Olatunji SO
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jun; 109():101-111. PubMed ID: 31054385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
Jebamony J; Jacob D
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Building machine learning models without sharing patient data: A simulation-based analysis of distributed learning by ensembling.
Tuladhar A; Gill S; Ismail Z; Forkert ND;
J Biomed Inform; 2020 Jun; 106():103424. PubMed ID: 32335226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Drug design by machine learning: support vector machines for pharmaceutical data analysis.
Burbidge R; Trotter M; Buxton B; Holden S
Comput Chem; 2001 Dec; 26(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 11765851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine learning for evolutive lymphoma and residual masses recognition in whole body diffusion weighted magnetic resonance images.
Ferjaoui R; Cherni MA; Boujnah S; Kraiem NEH; Kraiem T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 209():106320. PubMed ID: 34390938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine-learning models for activity class prediction: A comparative study of feature selection and classification algorithms.
Chong J; Tjurin P; Niemelä M; Jämsä T; Farrahi V
Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():45-53. PubMed ID: 34225240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing SVM and ANN based Machine Learning Methods for Species Identification of Food Contaminating Beetles.
Bisgin H; Bera T; Ding H; Semey HG; Wu L; Liu Z; Barnes AE; Langley DA; Pava-Ripoll M; Vyas HJ; Tong W; Xu J
Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6532. PubMed ID: 29695741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI).
Minerali E; Foil DH; Zorn KM; Lane TR; Ekins S
Mol Pharm; 2020 Jul; 17(7):2628-2637. PubMed ID: 32422053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction to natural language processing.
Harrison CJ; Sidey-Gibbons CJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):158. PubMed ID: 34332525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A predictive model of recreational water quality based on adaptive synthetic sampling algorithms and machine learning.
Xu T; Coco G; Neale M
Water Res; 2020 Jun; 177():115788. PubMed ID: 32330740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for clinical event prediction (risk of coronary heart disease).
Beunza JJ; Puertas E; García-Ovejero E; Villalba G; Condes E; Koleva G; Hurtado C; Landecho MF
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Sep; 97():103257. PubMed ID: 31374261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction Models for Railway Track Geometry Degradation Using Machine Learning Methods: A Review.
Liao Y; Han L; Wang H; Zhang H
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for risk prediction of asthma disease.
Ullah R; Khan S; Ali H; Chaudhary II; Bilal M; Ahmad I
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Dec; 28():292-296. PubMed ID: 31614223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Integrated Approach of Machine Learning and Systems Thinking for Waiting Time Prediction in an Emergency Department.
Kuo YH; Chan NB; Leung JMY; Meng H; So AM; Tsoi KKF; Graham CA
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Jul; 139():104143. PubMed ID: 32330853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF ABNORMAL GLOW CURVES AND ASSOCIATED ABNORMALITY IN CaSO4:DY-BASED PERSONNEL MONITORING DOSIMETERS.
Pathan MS; Pradhan SM; Selvam TP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Sep; 190(3):342-351. PubMed ID: 32857133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
