These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34563654)

  • 101. Deep Learning-Based Methods for Automatic Diagnosis of Skin Lesions.
    El-Khatib H; Popescu D; Ichim L
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 32245258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Exploiting heterogeneous features to improve in silico prediction of peptide status - amyloidogenic or non-amyloidogenic.
    Nair SS; Subba Reddy NV; Hareesha KS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011; 12 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S21. PubMed ID: 22373069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. Architectures and accuracy of artificial neural network for disease classification from omics data.
    Yu H; Samuels DC; Zhao YY; Guo Y
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):167. PubMed ID: 30832569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. Class-imbalanced crash prediction based on real-time traffic and weather data: A driving simulator study.
    Elamrani Abou Elassad Z; Mousannif H; Al Moatassime H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 32125890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. Comparison of survival predictions for rats with hemorrhagic shocks using an artificial neural network and support vector machine.
    Jang KH; Yoo TK; Choi JY; Nam KC; Choi JL; Kwon MK; Kim DW
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():91-4. PubMed ID: 22254258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. A deep neural network-based approach for prediction of mutagenicity of compounds.
    Kumar R; Khan FU; Sharma A; Siddiqui MH; Aziz IB; Kamal MA; Ashraf GM; Alghamdi BS; Uddin MS
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(34):47641-47650. PubMed ID: 33895950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. Diagnosis of Operating Conditions of the Electrical Submersible Pump via Machine Learning.
    Brasil J; Maitelli C; Nascimento J; Chiavone-Filho O; Galvão E
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36616878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Performance of a Stratified Thermal Energy Storage Tank at a District Cooling Plant Using Sensor Data.
    Soomro AA; Mokhtar AA; Salilew WM; Abdul Karim ZA; Abbasi A; Lashari N; Jameel SM
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. What makes a good prediction? Feature importance and beginning to open the black box of machine learning in genetics.
    Musolf AM; Holzinger ER; Malley JD; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Hum Genet; 2022 Sep; 141(9):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 34862561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. Comparison of Predictions by BCS, rDCS and Machine Learning for the Effect of Food on Oral Drug Absorption Based on Features Calculated In silico.
    Hoshino Y; Yoshioka H; Hisaka A
    AAPS J; 2021 Dec; 24(1):10. PubMed ID: 34893922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. A review of recent developments in the application of machine learning in solar thermal collector modelling.
    Vakili M; Salehi SA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(2):2406-2439. PubMed ID: 36399296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. In silico prediction of potential drug-induced nephrotoxicity with machine learning methods.
    Gong Y; Teng D; Wang Y; Gu Y; Wu Z; Li W; Tang Y; Liu G
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Oct; 42(10):1639-1650. PubMed ID: 35429013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. Development of advanced machine learning models for analysis of plutonium surrogate optical emission spectra.
    Rao AP; Jenkins PR; Auxier JD; Shattan MB; Patnaik AK
    Appl Opt; 2022 Mar; 61(7):D30-D38. PubMed ID: 35297826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. An Efficient Machine Learning-Based Feature Optimization Model for the Detection of Dyslexia.
    Ahmad N; Rehman MB; El Hassan HM; Ahmad I; Rashid M
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():8491753. PubMed ID: 35855801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Predicting daily pore water pressure in embankment dam: Empowering Machine Learning-based modeling.
    El Bilali A; Moukhliss M; Taleb A; Nafii A; Alabjah B; Brouziyne Y; Mazigh N; Teznine K; Mhamed M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(31):47382-47398. PubMed ID: 35181857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. Prediction of influencing atmospheric conditions for explosion Avoidance in fireworks manufacturing Industry-A network approach.
    Nallathambi I; Ramar R; Pustokhin DA; Pustokhina IV; Sharma DK; Sengan S
    Environ Pollut; 2022 Jul; 304():119182. PubMed ID: 35337888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. Comprehensive Machine Learning Prediction of Extensive Enzymatic Reactions.
    Watanabe N; Yamamoto M; Murata M; Vavricka CJ; Ogino C; Kondo A; Araki M
    J Phys Chem B; 2022 Sep; 126(36):6762-6770. PubMed ID: 36053051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. Prediction of radiosensitivity and radiocurability using a novel supervised artificial neural network.
    Zeng Z; Luo M; Li Y; Li J; Huang Z; Zeng Y; Yuan Y; Wang M; Liu Y; Gong Y; Xie C
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1243. PubMed ID: 36451111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning.
    Gillich N; Tufisi C; Sacarea C; Rusu CV; Gillich GR; Praisach ZI; Ardeljan M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Unlocking the Power of Artificial Intelligence: Accurate Zeta Potential Prediction Using Machine Learning.
    Muneer R; Hashmet MR; Pourafshary P; Shakeel M
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37049303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.