These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34563812)
21. Mechanical stress in plates for bridging reconstruction mandibular defects and purposes of double plate reinforcement. Hoefert S; Taier R J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 46(5):785-794. PubMed ID: 29567342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biomechanical evaluation of two internal fixation systems for the treatment of mandibular symphyseal fracture. Wongwaithongdee U; Inglam S; Chantarapanich N Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 May; 237(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 37070457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis. Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Establishment of sequential software processing for a biomechanical model of mandibular reconstruction with custom-made plate. Li P; Tang Y; Li J; Shen L; Tian W; Tang W Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Sep; 111(3):642-9. PubMed ID: 23810232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Feasibility of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer fixation plates for treatment of atrophic mandibular fracture: A finite element method. Nurettin D; Burak B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2182-2189. PubMed ID: 30340836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method. Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang JH; Jun JC; Jiang XF; Wang R; Baur DA J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 30482534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental validation of finite element simulation of a new custom-designed fixation plate to treat mandibular angle fracture. Xu X; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Fan YY; Wang JH; Wang R; Baur DA; Jiang XF; Dong XT Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Feb; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 33546713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical Evaluation and Factorial Analysis of the 3-Dimensional Printing Self-Designed Metallic Reconstruction Plate for Mandibular Segmental Defect. Lin TS; Chiu TF; Hsu JT; Chen CC; Chang LR; Huang HL J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 80(4):775-783. PubMed ID: 34968419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Neck Screw and Conventional Fixation Techniques in Mandibular Condyle Fractures Using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Conci RA; Tomazi FH; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; Fritscher GG; Heitz C J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1321-7. PubMed ID: 25869984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical comparison of titanium miniplates versus a variety of CAD/CAM plates in mandibular reconstruction. Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Vollmer M; Morlock MM; Heiland M; Huber G; Rendenbach C J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():104007. PubMed ID: 32854074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical evaluation of a new MatrixMandible plating system on cadaver mandibles. Gateno J; Cookston C; Hsu SS; Stal DN; Durrani SK; Gold J; Ismaily S; Alexander JW; Noble PC; Xia JJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1900-14. PubMed ID: 24012175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical assessment of mandibular fracture fixation using finite element analysis validated by polymeric mandible mechanical testing. Daqiq O; Roossien CC; Wubs FW; van Minnen B Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11795. PubMed ID: 38782942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimal configuration of a dual locking plate for femoral allograft or recycled autograft bone fixation: A finite element and biomechanical analysis. Wisanuyotin T; Sirichativapee W; Paholpak P; Kosuwon W; Kasai Y Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2020 Dec; 80():105156. PubMed ID: 32862075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimal placement of fixation system for scaffold-based mandibular reconstruction. Ferguson BM; Entezari A; Fang J; Li Q J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():104855. PubMed ID: 34872868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Finite element analysis of stress distribution on reconstructed mandibular models for autogenous bone grafts. Kucukguven MB; Akkocaoğlu M Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(3):249-258. PubMed ID: 31594270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical evaluation of different angle-stable locking plate systems for mandibular surgery. Lieger O; Schaller B; Bürki A; Büchler P J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1589-94. PubMed ID: 26297419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in mandibular angle fractures. Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kilinc Y; Arslan M Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 27022805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Finite Element Analysis of Screw Layout of Locking Plate for Treating Femoral Shaft Fracture]. Sheng W; Ji A; Chen C Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2017 May; 41(3):196-199. PubMed ID: 29862767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Stoffel K; Dieter U; Stachowiak G; Gächter A; Kuster MS Injury; 2003 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():B11-9. PubMed ID: 14580982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study. Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]