These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34563812)
41. Biomechanical analysis of mandibular defect reconstruction based on a new base-fixation system. Cui H; Gao L; Han J; Liu J Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2022 Nov; 25(14):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 35060776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Influence of the proximal screws of buttress plates on the stability of vertical femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis. Zhan S; Jiang D; Xu J; Ling M; Yang K; Li Y; Jia W; Hu H; Zhang C BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Dec; 21(1):842. PubMed ID: 33308185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy. Narra N; Valášek J; Hannula M; Marcián P; Sándor GK; Hyttinen J; Wolff J J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):264-8. PubMed ID: 24290177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Biomechanical comparison of locking plate and crossing metallic and absorbable screws fixations for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Ni M; Wong DW; Mei J; Niu W; Zhang M Sci China Life Sci; 2016 Sep; 59(9):958-64. PubMed ID: 27349998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Finite element analysis of 3D-printed personalized titanium plates for mandibular angle fracture. Li Y; Li H; Lai Q; Xue R; Zhu K; Deng Y Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Jan; 26(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 35587215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [A new exploration and consideration of Type A fracture of distal femur based on finite element biomechanical analysis]. Xu D; Sun RJ; Wang TY; Zhao XQ; Bi ZG; Geng S Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 57(11):812-817. PubMed ID: 31694128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The feasibility of a custom-made endoprosthesis in mandibular reconstruction: Implant design and finite element analysis. Pinheiro M; Alves JL J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2116-28. PubMed ID: 26596361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Computational Biomechanical Analysis of Postoperative Calcaneal Fractures with Different Placement of the Sustentaculum Screw. Qiang MF; Singh RK; Chen YX; Zhang K; Jia XY; Chen S; Wang SG; Wang X; Shi ZM Orthop Surg; 2020 Apr; 12(2):661-667. PubMed ID: 32053281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of different stable internal fixation in unfavorable mandible fractures under finite element analysis. Patussi C; Sassi LM; Cruz R; Klein Parise G; Costa D; Rebellato NLB Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 23(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 31240571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Development of a new V-shaped implant with locking plates and screws for mandibular fracture fixation: an in vitro study using finite element analysis. Bhagat JA; Naganathan V; Krishnan L; Raj D; Prakash R Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 57(8):805-807. PubMed ID: 31362834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Biomechanical investigation of the type and configuration of screws used in high tibial osteotomy with titanium locking plate and screw fixation. Chen YN; Chang CW; Li CT; Chen CH; Chung CR; Chang CH; Peng YT J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jan; 14(1):35. PubMed ID: 30691494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of optimal screw configurations in two locking plate systems for proximal humerus fixation - a finite element analysis study. Mischler D; Babu S; Osterhoff G; Pari C; Fletcher J; Windolf M; Gueorguiev B; Varga P Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2020 Aug; 78():105097. PubMed ID: 32623297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The comparison between various methods of mandibular reconstruction based on finite element analysis. Parvan M; Khaghaninejad MS; Karimi MT Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Apr; 238(4):423-429. PubMed ID: 38415325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction. Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Willsch M; Soares AP; Morlock MM; Heiland M; Kreutzer K; Huber G; Rendenbach C J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Apr; 140():105742. PubMed ID: 36857975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [A finite element analysis of petal-shaped poly-axial locking plate fixation in treatment of Y-shaped patellar fracture]. Meng D; Ouyang Y; Hou C Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1456-1461. PubMed ID: 29806387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. "A" shape plate for open rigid internal fixation of mandible condyle neck fracture. Kozakiewicz M; Swiniarski J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 24359864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The biomechanical effect of bone quality and fracture topography on locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures. Leonidou A; Moazen M; Lepetsos P; Graham SM; Macheras GA; Tsiridis E Injury; 2015 Feb; 46(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 25467710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Finite Element Evaluation of Different Osteosynthesis Variations That Used After Segmental Mandibular Resection. Şanal KO; Özden B; Baş B J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 27893561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparison of stresses in implantation for grafted and plate-and-screw mandible reconstruction. Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Tamaki T; Kawana H Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 20097102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Finite element analysis of a novel anatomical locking plate for scapular neck fracture. Xiang F; Xiao Y; Wei D; Tan X; He S; Luo L; Yang Y J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 18(1):262. PubMed ID: 37004037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]