These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34563909)
21. Analysis of Kansas Water Well Policies and Proposal of Nonpublic Household Water Well Recommendations. Ablah E; Marrow MW; Brown J; Honn A Environ Health Perspect; 2020 Feb; 128(2):25001. PubMed ID: 32068469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High levels of faecal contamination in drinking groundwater and recreational water due to poor sanitation, in the sub-rural neighbourhoods of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Kayembe JM; Thevenon F; Laffite A; Sivalingam P; Ngelinkoto P; Mulaji CK; Otamonga JP; Mubedi JI; Poté J Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2018 Apr; 221(3):400-408. PubMed ID: 29396027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors affecting continued use of ceramic water purifiers distributed to tsunami-affected communities in Sri Lanka. Casanova LM; Walters A; Naghawatte A; Sobsey MD Trop Med Int Health; 2012 Nov; 17(11):1361-8. PubMed ID: 23006249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Exploration of E. coli contamination drivers in private drinking water wells: An application of machine learning to a large, multivariable, geo-spatio-temporal dataset. White K; Dickson-Anderson S; Majury A; McDermott K; Hynds P; Brown RS; Schuster-Wallace C Water Res; 2021 Jun; 197():117089. PubMed ID: 33836295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Acceptance and use of eight arsenic-safe drinking water options in Bangladesh. Inauen J; Hossain MM; Johnston RB; Mosler HJ PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53640. PubMed ID: 23326477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Deep tubewell microbial water quality and access in arsenic mitigation programs in rural Bangladesh. Goel V; Islam MS; Yunus M; Ali MT; Khan AF; Alam N; Faruque ASG; Bell G; Sobsey M; Emch M Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 659():1577-1584. PubMed ID: 31096367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Elevated Lead in Water of Private Wells Poses Health Risks: Case Study in Macon County, North Carolina. Pieper KJ; Nystrom VE; Parks J; Jennings K; Faircloth H; Morgan JB; Bruckner J; Edwards MA Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Apr; 52(7):4350-4357. PubMed ID: 29536726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Developing a framework for classifying water lead levels at private drinking water systems: A Bayesian Belief Network approach. Fasaee MAK; Berglund E; Pieper KJ; Ling E; Benham B; Edwards M Water Res; 2021 Feb; 189():116641. PubMed ID: 33271412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior. Flanagan SV; Spayd SE; Procopio NA; Chillrud SN; Braman S; Zheng Y Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 562():999-1009. PubMed ID: 27118151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Health protective behavior following required arsenic testing under the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act. Flanagan SV; Gleason JA; Spayd SE; Procopio NA; Rockafellow-Baldoni M; Braman S; Chillrud SN; Zheng Y Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 221(6):929-940. PubMed ID: 29884571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Case for Universal Screening of Private Well Water Quality in the U.S. and Testing Requirements to Achieve It: Evidence from Arsenic. Zheng Y; Flanagan SV Environ Health Perspect; 2017 Aug; 125(8):085002. PubMed ID: 28893720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reducing Emergency Department Visits for Acute Gastrointestinal Illnesses in North Carolina (USA) by Extending Community Water Service. DeFelice NB; Johnston JE; Gibson JM Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Oct; 124(10):1583-1591. PubMed ID: 27203131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Water quality perceptions and private well management: The role of perceived risks, worry and control. Schuitema G; Hooks T; McDermott F J Environ Manage; 2020 Aug; 267():110654. PubMed ID: 32421679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Importance of regular testing of private drinking water systems in North Carolina. Barros N; Rudo K; Shehee M N C Med J; 2014; 75(6):429-34. PubMed ID: 25402702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of time and point-of-use devices on arsenic levels in Southeastern Michigan drinking water, USA. Slotnick MJ; Meliker JR; Nriagu JO Sci Total Environ; 2006 Oct; 369(1-3):42-50. PubMed ID: 16750243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contamination of Canadian private drinking water sources with antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli. Coleman BL; Louie M; Salvadori MI; McEwen SA; Neumann N; Sibley K; Irwin RJ; Jamieson FB; Daignault D; Majury A; Braithwaite S; Crago B; McGeer AJ Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(9):3026-36. PubMed ID: 23548566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Public perceptions of drinking water: a postal survey of residents with private water supplies. Jones AQ; Dewey CE; Doré K; Majowicz SE; McEwen SA; David WT; Eric M; Carr DJ; Henson SJ BMC Public Health; 2006 Apr; 6():94. PubMed ID: 16608511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Understanding the translation of scientific knowledge about arsenic risk exposure among private well water users in Nova Scotia. Chappells H; Campbell N; Drage J; Fernandez CV; Parker L; Dummer TJ Sci Total Environ; 2015 Feb; 505():1259-73. PubMed ID: 24444512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Drinking Water From Private Wells and Risks to Children. Woolf AD; Stierman BD; Barnett ED; Byron LG; ; Pediatrics; 2023 Feb; 151(2):. PubMed ID: 36995187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of the novel NCWELL database highlights two decades of co-occurrence of toxic metals in North Carolina private well water: Public health and environmental justice implications. Eaves LA; Keil AP; Rager JE; George A; Fry RC Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 812():151479. PubMed ID: 34767890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]