283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34564678)
1. Can buccal infiltration of articaine replace traditional inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of mandibular molars in pediatric patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu J; Liu S; Zhang X
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2021 Nov; 26(6):e754-e761. PubMed ID: 34564678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block and inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal or lingual infiltration using articaine in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a preliminary prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial.
Afkhami F; Pirmoazen S; Ardestani A; Fard MJK
Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):820-826. PubMed ID: 34369941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EFFICACY OF 4% ARTICAINE BUCCAL INFILTRATION VERSUS INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK FOR MANDIBULAR MOLARS WITH SYMPTOMATIC IRREVERSIBLE PULPITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
Almadhoon HW; Abuiriban RW; Almassri H; Al-Hamed FS
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2022 Jun; 22(2):101712. PubMed ID: 35718426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
Shapiro MR; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC; Botero TM
J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 29397214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Rogers BS; Botero TM; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 24862701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of primary mandibular molars: A prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
Jain K; Katge F; Chimata VK; Patil D; Ghadge S; Bhanushali N
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 35102967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molars of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
Dianat O; Mozayeni MA; Layeghnejad MK; Shojaeian S
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 31302768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Preoperative Oral Ketorolac on Anesthetic Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal and Lingual Infiltration with Articaine and Lidocaine in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study.
Yadav M; Grewal MS; Grewal S; Deshwal P
J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1773-7. PubMed ID: 26410153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine in root canal treatment of teeth with molar incisor hypomineralization.
Thomas AM; George S; Anandaraj S
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2023 Oct; 41(4):316-321. PubMed ID: 38235818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Ashraf H; Kazem M; Dianat O; Noghrehkar F
J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 23228249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BUCCAL INFILTRATION WITH 4% ARTICAINE MAY BE AN ALTERNATIVE OPTION TO INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE BLOCK WITH 2% LIDOCAINE FOR PULP THERAPY IN PRIMARY MANDIBULAR MOLARS.
Zhou X; Nanayakkara S
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2022 Dec; 22(4):101801. PubMed ID: 36494115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Success Rate of 3 Injection Methods with Articaine for Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A CONSORT Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial.
Shahi S; Rahimi S; Yavari HR; Ghasemi N; Ahmadi F
J Endod; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1462-1466. PubMed ID: 30174101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison Of Anaesthetic Efficacy Of Articaine And Lidocaine In Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment Of Permanent Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis. A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Khan Q; Noor N; Anayat N; Khan TS; Ahmed M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(2):192-197. PubMed ID: 34137527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial.
Poorni S; Veniashok B; Senthilkumar AD; Indira R; Ramachandran S
J Endod; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1603-7. PubMed ID: 22099890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary and supplementary anesthetic efficacy of a modified two-step buccal infiltration of 4% articaine in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial.
Vatankhah M; Zargar N; Naseri M; Sadeghi S; Baghban AA; Dianat O; Nusstein JM
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 28(1):33. PubMed ID: 38147088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars.
Daneshvar SH; Dorani D; Daneshvar MM
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 34810348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Aggarwal V; Jain A; Kabi D
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):925-9. PubMed ID: 19567309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vivo, randomized, controlled comparative evaluation of efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications of 4% articaine using buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine using inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars of children aged 6 to 8 years.
Khanna SR; Rao D; Panwar S; Ameen S
Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 34076382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 19228214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
