110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34565034)
1. Effects of varying statistical uncertainty using a Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for VMAT.
Rembish J; Myers P; Saenz D; Kirby N; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J BUON; 2021; 26(4):1683. PubMed ID: 34565034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recommended dose voxel size and statistical uncertainty parameters for precision of Monte Carlo dose calculation in stereotactic radiotherapy.
Goodall SK; Ebert MA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 21(12):120-130. PubMed ID: 33124741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantified difference of the collapsed cone convolution (CCC) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms based on DVH and gamma analysis for cervical cancer radiation therapy.
Zhang R; Bai J; Wang R; Yan J; Chang L; Bai H
Appl Radiat Isot; 2024 Aug; 210():111340. PubMed ID: 38749237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric impact of statistical uncertainty on Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy using Monaco TPS for three different clinical cases.
Palanisamy M; David K; Durai M; Bhalla N; Puri A
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2019; 24(2):188-199. PubMed ID: 30820193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced optimization of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans using Monte Carlo generated beamlets.
Mathews J; French SB; Bhagroo S; Pant A; Nazareth DP
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6053-6067. PubMed ID: 32978967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Independent absorbed-dose calculation using the Monte Carlo algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Haga A; Magome T; Takenaka S; Imae T; Sakumi A; Nomoto A; Igaki H; Shiraishi K; Yamashita H; Ohtomo K; Nakagawa K
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():75. PubMed ID: 24625221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of Pencil Beam vs Monte Carlo calculations for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery.
Rembish J; Myers P; Kirby N; Saenz D; Rasmussen K; Crownover R; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J BUON; 2020; 25(6):2731-2736. PubMed ID: 33455120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Basic Research on Comparative Evaluation of Calculated Dose Distribution Using Monte Carlo Algorithm-equipped Treatment Planning Systems in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy].
Toyota M; Oku Y; Saigo Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(8):795-804. PubMed ID: 34421067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of dose calculation uncertainty on the evaluation of radiotherapy plans.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):478-84. PubMed ID: 10757600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dependence of volume dose indices on dose calculation algorithms for VMAT-SBRT plans for peripheral lung tumor.
Matsuoka T; Araki F; Ohno T; Sakata J; Tominaga H
Med Dosim; 2019 Autumn; 44(3):284-290. PubMed ID: 30455092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Removing the effect of statistical uncertainty on dose-volume histograms from Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Aug; 45(8):2151-61. PubMed ID: 10958186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of dose differences between two versions of Acuros XB algorithm compared to Monte Carlo simulations--the effect on clinical patient treatment planning.
Ojala JJ; Kapanen M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):213-225. PubMed ID: 26699576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of biological versus physical optimization for single-arc VMAT for prostate and head and neck cases.
Pyshniak V; Fotina I; Zverava A; Siamkouski S; Zayats E; Kopanitsa G; Okuntsau D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4514. PubMed ID: 25207394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical comparison of dose calculation using the enhanced collapsed cone algorithm vs. a new Monte Carlo algorithm.
Fotina I; Kragl G; Kroupa B; Trausmuth R; Georg D
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Jul; 187(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 21713394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of uncertainty-based stopping criteria for monte carlo calculations of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and arc therapy patient dose distributions.
Vanderstraeten B; Olteanu AM; Reynaert N; Leal A; De Neve W; Thierens H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):628-37. PubMed ID: 17869677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement comparison and Monte Carlo analysis for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery verification using the ArcCHECK dosimetry system.
Lin MH; Koren S; Veltchev I; Li J; Wang L; Price RA; Ma CM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):3929. PubMed ID: 23470927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
