136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34565547)
21. Prediction of failure in cancellous bone using extended finite element method.
Salem M; Westover L; Adeeb S; Duke K
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Sep; 234(9):988-999. PubMed ID: 32605523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incorporating tissue anisotropy and heterogeneity in finite element models of trabecular bone altered predicted local stress distributions.
Hammond MA; Wallace JM; Allen MR; Siegmund T
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Apr; 17(2):605-614. PubMed ID: 29139053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of mesh morphing and mapping techniques in patient specific modelling of the human pelvis.
Salo Z; Beek M; Whyne CM
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 28(8):904-13. PubMed ID: 25099570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Trabecular bone strength predictions using finite element analysis of micro-scale images at limited spatial resolution.
Bevill G; Keaveny TM
Bone; 2009 Apr; 44(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 19135184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. On the limits of finite element models created from (micro)CT datasets and used in studies of bone-implant-related biomechanical problems.
Marcián P; Borák L; Zikmund T; Horáčková L; Kaiser J; Joukal M; Wolff J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 May; 117():104393. PubMed ID: 33647729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finite element analysis of trabecular bone structure: a comparison of image-based meshing techniques.
Ulrich D; van Rietbergen B; Weinans H; Rüegsegger P
J Biomech; 1998 Dec; 31(12):1187-92. PubMed ID: 9882053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting Trabecular Bone Stiffness from Clinical Cone-Beam CT and HR-pQCT Data; an In Vitro Study Using Finite Element Analysis.
Klintström E; Klintström B; Moreno R; Brismar TB; Pahr DH; Smedby Ö
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161101. PubMed ID: 27513664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation.
Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Allmer H; Charlebois M; Zysset P
J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3333-40. PubMed ID: 17572433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Numerical modelling of cancellous bone damage using an orthotropic failure criterion and tissue elastic properties as a function of the mineral content and microporosity.
Megías R; Vercher-Martínez A; Belda R; Peris JL; Larrainzar-Garijo R; Giner E; Fuenmayor FJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 219():106764. PubMed ID: 35366593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assigning trabecular bone material properties in finite element models simulating the pelvis before and after the development of peri-prosthetic osteolytic lesions.
Grace TM; Solomon LB; Atkins GJ; Thewlis D; Taylor M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105311. PubMed ID: 35716527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of enhanced continuum FE with micro FE models of human vertebral bodies.
Pahr DH; Zysset PK
J Biomech; 2009 Mar; 42(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 19155014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.
Pahr DH; Zysset PK
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2016 Dec; 14(6):374-385. PubMed ID: 27714581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of microcomputed tomography voxel size on the finite element model accuracy for human cancellous bone.
Yeni YN; Christopherson GT; Dong XN; Kim DG; Fyhrie DP
J Biomech Eng; 2005 Feb; 127(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15868782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparisons of node-based and element-based approaches of assigning bone material properties onto subject-specific finite element models.
Chen G; Wu FY; Liu ZC; Yang K; Cui F
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):808-12. PubMed ID: 26054803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Material model of pelvic bone based on modal analysis: a study on the composite bone.
Henyš P; Čapek L
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Feb; 16(1):363-373. PubMed ID: 27561650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trabecular plates and rods determine elastic modulus and yield strength of human trabecular bone.
Wang J; Zhou B; Liu XS; Fields AJ; Sanyal A; Shi X; Adams M; Keaveny TM; Guo XE
Bone; 2015 Mar; 72():71-80. PubMed ID: 25460571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Representation of bone heterogeneity in subject-specific finite element models for knee.
Au AG; Liggins AB; Raso VJ; Carey J; Amirfazli A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Aug; 99(2):154-71. PubMed ID: 20022400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Subject-specific finite element simulation of the human femur considering inhomogeneous material properties: a straightforward method and convergence study.
Hölzer A; Schröder C; Woiczinski M; Sadoghi P; Scharpf A; Heimkes B; Jansson V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 23084242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Micro-finite element simulation of trabecular-bone post-yield behaviour--effects of material model, element size and type.
Verhulp E; Van Rietbergen B; Muller R; Huiskes R
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Aug; 11(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 18568833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
