These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34565941)

  • 1. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
    Kern JL; Choe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item exposure control for multidimensional computer adaptive testing under maximum likelihood and expected a posteriori estimation.
    Huebner AR; Wang C; Quinlan K; Seubert L
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1443-1453. PubMed ID: 26487053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice.
    Becker B; Debeer D; Weirich S; Goldhammer F
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Sep; 45(6):407-422. PubMed ID: 34565944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests.
    Han KT
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 40(4):289-301. PubMed ID: 29881054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Item Scores and Distractors to Detect Test Speededness.
    Gorney K; Wollack JA; Bolt DM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Sep; 47(5-6):386-401. PubMed ID: 37810541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model.
    Seo DG; Weiss DJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Dec; 75(6):954-978. PubMed ID: 29795848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of Test Speededness Using Change-Point Analysis.
    Shao C; Li J; Cheng Y
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1118-1141. PubMed ID: 26305400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing Computerized Adaptive Testing with Batteries of Unidimensional Tests.
    Anselmi P; Robusto E; Cristante F
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 May; 47(3):167-182. PubMed ID: 37113522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Accuracy of the Empirical Item Characteristic Curve Preequating Method in the Presence of Test Speededness.
    Qiu Y; Huggins-Manley AC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):288-309. PubMed ID: 30911194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control.
    Chen JH; Chao HY; Chen SY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):182-196. PubMed ID: 32341606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of Change Point Analysis of Response Time Data to Detect Test Speededness.
    Cheng Y; Shao C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):1031-1062. PubMed ID: 35989725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory.
    Sorrel MA; Barrada JR; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227196. PubMed ID: 31923227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Item-Weighted Likelihood Method for Measuring Growth in Longitudinal Study With Tests Composed of Both Dichotomous and Polytomous Items.
    Xue X; Lu J; Zhang J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():580015. PubMed ID: 34385940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior Distribution and Entropy in Computer Adaptive Testing Ability Estimation through MAP or EAP.
    Suárez-Cansino J; López-Morales V; Morales-Manilla LR; Alberto-Rodríguez A; Ramos-Fernández JC
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Dec; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data.
    Klotzke K; Fox JP
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1675. PubMed ID: 31428007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imputation Methods to Deal With Missing Responses in Computerized Adaptive Multistage Testing.
    Cetin-Berber DD; Sari HI; Huggins-Manley AC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):495-511. PubMed ID: 31105320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maximum likelihood blood velocity estimator incorporating properties of flow physics.
    Schlaikjer M; Jensen JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 14995019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.