These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34565941)

  • 21. Modeling Response Time and Responses in Multidimensional Health Measurement.
    Wang C; Weiss DJ; Su S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():51. PubMed ID: 30761036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clarifying the Effect of Test Speededness.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):611-623. PubMed ID: 31551639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Introduction to the LIVECAT web-based computerized adaptive testing platform.
    Seo DG; Choi J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():27. PubMed ID: 33401349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of estimation methods adjusting for selection bias in adaptive enrichment designs with time-to-event endpoints.
    Di Stefano F; Pannaux M; Correges A; Galtier S; Robert V; Saint-Hilary G
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(10):1767-1779. PubMed ID: 35098579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bayesian Analysis of Aberrant Response and Response Time Data.
    Zhang Z; Zhang J; Lu J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():841372. PubMed ID: 35548497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Comprehensive Review and Comparison of CUSUM and Change-Point-Analysis Methods to Detect Test Speededness.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(1):112-133. PubMed ID: 32877253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Post-hoc simulation study of computerized adaptive testing for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Choi J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():14. PubMed ID: 29770677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How Speededness of a Reasoning Test and the Complexity of Mental Speed Tasks Influence the Relation between Mental Speed and Reasoning Ability.
    Borter N; Schlegel K; Troche SJ
    J Intell; 2023 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 37233338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multidimensional CAT Item Selection Methods for Domain Scores and Composite Scores: Theory and Applications.
    Yao L
    Psychometrika; 2012 Jul; 77(3):495-523. PubMed ID: 27519778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparison of Robust Likelihood Estimators to Mitigate Bias From Rapid Guessing.
    Rios JA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):236-249. PubMed ID: 35528268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An Improved Parameter Estimator of the Homodyned K Distribution Based on the Maximum Likelihood Method for Ultrasound Tissue Characterization.
    Liu Y; Zhang Y; He B; Li Z; Lang X; Liang H; Chen J
    Ultrason Imaging; 2022 Jul; 44(4):142-160. PubMed ID: 35674146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New Efficient and Practicable Adaptive Designs for Calibrating Items Online.
    He Y; Chen P; Li Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jan; 44(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 31853155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A General Three-Parameter Logistic Model With Time Effect.
    Zhang Z; Zhang J; Tao J; Shi N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1791. PubMed ID: 32849057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Item Selection With Collaborative Filtering in On-The-Fly Multistage Adaptive Testing.
    Xiao J; Bulut O
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Nov; 46(8):690-704. PubMed ID: 36262523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simulation study of activities of daily living functions using online computerized adaptive testing.
    Chien TW; Lin WS
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Oct; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 27724939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of an examinee's ability in the web-based computerized adaptive testing program IRT-CAT.
    Lee YH; Park JH; Park IY
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2006; 3():4. PubMed ID: 19223996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Penalized partial likelihood inference of proportional hazards latent trait models.
    Kang HA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27958648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What Information Works Best?: A Comparison of Routing Methods.
    Sari HI; Raborn A
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Sep; 42(6):499-515. PubMed ID: 30787490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.
    Jian X; Buyun D; Yuanping D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250268. PubMed ID: 33914784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.