These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34565944)

  • 1. On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice.
    Becker B; Debeer D; Weirich S; Goldhammer F
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Sep; 45(6):407-422. PubMed ID: 34565944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
    Kern JL; Choe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling Item Revisit Behavior: The Hierarchical Speed-Accuracy-Revisits Model.
    Bezirhan U; von Davier M; Grabovsky I
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):363-387. PubMed ID: 37929265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling Responses and Response Times in Tests With the Hierarchical Model and the Three-Parameter Lognormal Distribution.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Ortner TM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1059-1089. PubMed ID: 33116327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clarifying the Effect of Test Speededness.
    Hong MR; Cheng Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):611-623. PubMed ID: 31551639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using response time data to reduce testing time in cognitive tests.
    Bertling M; Weeks JP
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Mar; 30(3):328-338. PubMed ID: 28447813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A generalized linear factor model approach to the hierarchical framework for responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Tuerlinckx F; van der Maas HL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):197-219. PubMed ID: 25109494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items.
    Jin KY; Hsu CL; Chiu MM; Chen PH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jan; 47(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 36425284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of Change Point Analysis of Response Time Data to Detect Test Speededness.
    Cheng Y; Shao C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):1031-1062. PubMed ID: 35989725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data.
    Klotzke K; Fox JP
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1675. PubMed ID: 31428007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Polytomous Scoring Approach to Handle Not-Reached Items in Low-Stakes Assessments.
    Gorgun G; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 81(5):847-871. PubMed ID: 34421122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):257-279. PubMed ID: 27618470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should We Stop Developing Heuristics and Only Rely on Mixed Integer Programming Solvers in Automated Test Assembly? A Rejoinder to van der Linden and Li (2016).
    Chen PH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):227-240. PubMed ID: 29881090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Speededness of a Reasoning Test and the Complexity of Mental Speed Tasks Influence the Relation between Mental Speed and Reasoning Ability.
    Borter N; Schlegel K; Troche SJ
    J Intell; 2023 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 37233338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Item Scores and Distractors to Detect Test Speededness.
    Gorney K; Wollack JA; Bolt DM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Sep; 47(5-6):386-401. PubMed ID: 37810541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.