These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34565944)

  • 21. Evaluating the Accuracy of the Empirical Item Characteristic Curve Preequating Method in the Presence of Test Speededness.
    Qiu Y; Huggins-Manley AC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Apr; 79(2):288-309. PubMed ID: 30911194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
    Lu J; Wang C; Shi N
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 34355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accounting for individual differences in speed in the discretized signed residual time model.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Jul; 74 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):176-198. PubMed ID: 33351188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Parameter Estimation Accuracy of the Effort-Moderated Item Response Theory Model Under Multiple Assumption Violations.
    Rios JA; Soland J
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 81(3):569-594. PubMed ID: 33994564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modeling Response Time and Responses in Multidimensional Health Measurement.
    Wang C; Weiss DJ; Su S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():51. PubMed ID: 30761036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the Importance of the Speed-Ability Trade-Off When Dealing With Not Reached Items.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():964. PubMed ID: 29951023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; de Boeck P; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):1126-1148. PubMed ID: 27738955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Comparison of Robust Likelihood Estimators to Mitigate Bias From Rapid Guessing.
    Rios JA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):236-249. PubMed ID: 35528268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are Exam Questions Known in Advance? Using Local Dependence to Detect Cheating.
    Zimmermann S; Klusmann D; Hampe W
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167545. PubMed ID: 27907190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
    Man K; Harring JR; Jiao H; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):639-654. PubMed ID: 31551641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effort in Low-Stakes Assessments: What Does It Take to Perform as Well as in a High-Stakes Setting?
    Attali Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):1045-1058. PubMed ID: 29795900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of Test Speededness Using Change-Point Analysis.
    Shao C; Li J; Cheng Y
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1118-1141. PubMed ID: 26305400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Comprehensive Review and Comparison of CUSUM and Change-Point-Analysis Methods to Detect Test Speededness.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(1):112-133. PubMed ID: 32877253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modeling Test-Taking Non-effort in MIRT Models.
    Liu Y; Li Z; Liu H; Luo F
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():145. PubMed ID: 30778317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].
    Mackinnon A; Mulligan R
    Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.