These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34565944)

  • 41. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data.
    Batterman S; Su FC; Li S; Mukherjee B; Jia C;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (181):3-63. PubMed ID: 25145040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bridging Models of Biometric and Psychometric Assessment: A Three-Way Joint Modeling Approach of Item Responses, Response Times, and Gaze Fixation Counts.
    Man K; Harring JR; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jul; 46(5):361-381. PubMed ID: 35812811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evidence of Absence: Bayesian Way to Reveal True Zeros Among Occupational Exposures.
    Lavoue J; Burstyn I
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2021 Jan; 65(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 32914163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Derivation and Applicability of Asymptotic Results for Multiple Subtests Person-Fit Statistics.
    Albers CJ; Meijer RR; Tendeiro JN
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 40(4):274-288. PubMed ID: 29881053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data.
    Huang HY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1168-1195. PubMed ID: 33116331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Limited information estimation of the diffusion-based item response theory model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):122-38. PubMed ID: 26853083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Validation of Embedded Experience Sampling (EES) for Measuring Non-cognitive Facets of Problem-Solving Competence in Scenario-Based Assessments.
    Rausch A; Kögler K; Seifried J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1200. PubMed ID: 31178807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Multivariate Multilevel Approach to the Modeling of Accuracy and Speed of Test Takers.
    Klein Entink RH; Fox JP; van der Linden WJ
    Psychometrika; 2009 Mar; 74(1):21-48. PubMed ID: 20037635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A note on the hierarchical model for responses and response times in tests of van der Linden (2007).
    Ranger J
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 25106399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Mixture Fluency model using responses and response times with cognitive diagnosis model framework.
    Liu Z; Wang S; Zhang S; Qiu T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3396-3451. PubMed ID: 38361098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Graphical Item Maps: providing clearer feedback on professional exam performance.
    Beaves M; Wallace E; Zoanetti N; Griffin P; Wu M
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():116. PubMed ID: 38074561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bayesian hierarchical response time modelling-A tutorial.
    Koenig C; Becker B; Ulitzsch E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):623-645. PubMed ID: 36811176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How Do Men and Women Perceive a High-Stakes Test Situation?
    Leiner JEM; Scherndl T; Ortner TM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2216. PubMed ID: 30564160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Item response theory in high-stakes pharmacy assessments.
    Wolcott MD; Olsen AA; Augustine JM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 Sep; 14(9):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 36154966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Identifying low test-taking effort during low-stakes tests with the new Test-taking Effort Short Scale (TESS) - development and psychometrics.
    Schüttpelz-Brauns K; Kadmon M; Kiessling C; Karay Y; Gestmann M; Kämmer JE
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 May; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 29739405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Conditional Dependence between Response Time and Accuracy: An Overview of its Possible Sources and Directions for Distinguishing between Them.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D; De Boeck P
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():202. PubMed ID: 28261136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models.
    Liu Y; Yang JS; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):529-553. PubMed ID: 30895437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Generalized Speed-Accuracy Response Model for Dichotomous Items.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):109-131. PubMed ID: 29164449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.
    Goh JO; Su YS; Tang YJ; McCarrey AC; Tereshchenko A; Elkins W; Resnick SM
    J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(49):12498-12509. PubMed ID: 27927964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.