BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34567279)

  • 21. An extension of the best-worst method based on the spherical fuzzy sets for multi-criteria decision-making.
    Haseli G; Sheikh R; Ghoushchi SJ; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M; Moslem S; Deveci M; Kadry S
    Granul Comput; 2024; 9(2):40. PubMed ID: 38585422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():501. PubMed ID: 27186465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variable weights theory and its application to multi-attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers on determining decision maker's weights.
    Liu S; Yu W; Liu L; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212636. PubMed ID: 30840647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation.
    Dong Y; Herrera-Viedma E
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2015 Apr; 45(4):780-92. PubMed ID: 25069135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiple Group Decision Making for Selecting Emergency Alternatives: A Novel Method Based on the LDWPA Operator and LD-MABAC.
    Liang X; Teng F; Sun Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 32344552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Health-Care Waste Treatment Technology Selection Using the Interval 2-Tuple Induced TOPSIS Method.
    Lu C; You JX; Liu HC; Li P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 27271652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new multi-objective optimization ratio analysis plus full multiplication form method for the selection of an appropriate mining method based on 2-tuple spherical fuzzy linguistic sets.
    Khan A; Akram M; Ahmad U; Al-Shamiri MMA
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Jan; 20(1):456-488. PubMed ID: 36650774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimized multiple-attribute group decision-making through employing probabilistic hesitant fuzzy TODIM and EDAS technique and application to teaching quality evaluation of international Chinese course in higher vocational colleges.
    Xia F
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e25758. PubMed ID: 38379981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Digital Technology Strategies in COVID-19 Pandemic Under Uncertainty.
    Salimian S; Mousavi SM
    Arab J Sci Eng; 2023; 48(5):7005-7017. PubMed ID: 36090763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An efficiency-based interval type-2 fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making for makeshift hospital selection.
    Chen ZH; Wan SP; Dong JY
    Appl Soft Comput; 2022 Jan; 115():108243. PubMed ID: 34899106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An integrated group decision-making method under q-rung orthopair fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic context with partial weight information.
    Abbas F; Ali J; Mashwani WK; Syam MI
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0297462. PubMed ID: 38768117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consensus-Based Linguistic Distribution Large-Scale Group Decision Making Using Statistical Inference and Regret Theory.
    Jin F; Liu J; Zhou L; Martínez L
    Group Decis Negot; 2021; 30(4):813-845. PubMed ID: 33967394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. TODIM-VIKOR method based on hybrid weighted distance under probabilistic uncertain linguistic information and its application in medical logistics center site selection.
    Lei F; Cai Q; Liao N; Wei G; He Y; Wu J; Wei C
    Soft comput; 2023; 27(13):8541-8559. PubMed ID: 37255921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interactive multi-criteria group decision-making with probabilistic linguistic information for emergency assistance of COVID-19.
    Wan SP; Huang Cheng WB; Dong JY
    Appl Soft Comput; 2021 Aug; 107():107383. PubMed ID: 35721366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Three-way group decisions using evidence theory under hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment.
    Ding W; Li X; Shen X
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):22766. PubMed ID: 38123581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A data-driven group emergency decision-making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and its application in COVID-19 pandemic.
    Du K; Fan R; Wang Y; Wang D; Qian R; Zhu B
    Appl Soft Comput; 2023 May; 139():110213. PubMed ID: 37009545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contingency response decision of network public opinion emergencies based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and preference information of decision makers.
    Fu S; Xiao YZ; Zhou HJ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):3246. PubMed ID: 35228588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of improved fuzzy best worst analytic hierarchy process on renewable energy.
    Majumder P; Balas VE; Paul A; Baidya D
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e453. PubMed ID: 33954237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy MAGDM based on the WASPAS method for selection of solid waste disposal location.
    Akram M; Ali U; Santos-García G; Niaz Z
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Jan; 20(2):3811-3837. PubMed ID: 36899606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Grey relational analysis method for typhoon vulnerability assessment of civil engineering structures based on the 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic number.
    Qi Y; Zhu C; Wang F; Xia Y
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277539. PubMed ID: 36378666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.