380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34569371)
1. Comparison of the Dosimetric Influence of Applicator Displacement on 2D and 3D Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Treatment.
Wu A; Tang D; Wu A; Liu Y; Qian L; Zhu L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211041201. PubMed ID: 34569371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Point A vs. HR-CTV D
Harmon G; Diak A; Shea SM; Yacoub JH; Small W; Harkenrider MM
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):825-831. PubMed ID: 27693173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of 3D image-based PDR brachytherapy on outcome of patients treated for cervix carcinoma in France: results of the French STIC prospective study.
Charra-Brunaud C; Harter V; Delannes M; Haie-Meder C; Quetin P; Kerr C; Castelain B; Thomas L; Peiffert D
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jun; 103(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 22633469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric Comparison between Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided and Conventional Two-Dimensional Point A-Based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer.
Ren J; Yuan W; Wang R; Wang Q; Li Y; Xue C; Yan Y; Ma X; Tan L; Liu Z
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161932. PubMed ID: 27611853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utrecht Interstitial Applicator Shifts and DVH Parameter Changes in 3D CT-based HDR Brachytherapy of Cervical Cancer.
Shi D; He MY; Zhao ZP; Wu N; Zhao HF; Xu ZJ; Cheng GH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3945-9. PubMed ID: 25987066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long term experience with 3D image guided brachytherapy and clinical outcome in cervical cancer patients.
Ribeiro I; Janssen H; De Brabandere M; Nulens A; De Bal D; Vergote I; Van Limbergen E
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 27157510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel two-step optimization method for tandem and ovoid high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Sharma M; Fields EC; Todor DA
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 26092424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical feasibility of interstitial brachytherapy using a "hybrid" applicator combining uterine tandem and interstitial metal needles based on CT for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Liu ZS; Guo J; Lin X; Wang HY; Qiu L; Ren XJ; Li YF; Zhang BY; Wang TJ
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 27474180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamics of High Risk Clinical Target Volume reduction during Brachytherapy and impact on its coverage in patients with inoperable cervical cancer.
Pobijakova M; Scepanovic D; Paluga M; Fekete M; Mardiak J
Neoplasma; 2018 Mar; 65(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 29788726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Annede P; Dumas I; Schernberg A; Tailleur A; Fumagalli I; Bockel S; Mignot F; Kissel M; Deutsch E; Haie-Meder C; Chargari C
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 30797698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can MRI-only replace MRI-CT planning with a titanium tandem and ovoid applicator?
Harkenrider MM; Patel R; Surucu M; Chinsky B; Mysz ML; Wood A; Ryan K; Shea SM; Small W; Roeske JC
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(5):747-752. PubMed ID: 29945764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed Tomography-Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Introduction of the Technique and a Comparison of Dosimetry With Conventional Intracavitary Brachytherapy.
Liu ZS; Guo J; Zhao YZ; Lin X; Zhang BY; Zhang C; Wang HY; Yu L; Ren XJ; Wang TJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):768-775. PubMed ID: 28267131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of bladder distension on doses to organs at risk in Pulsed-Dose-Rate 3D image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Nesseler JP; Charra-Brunaud C; Salleron J; Py JF; Huertas A; Meknaci E; Courrech F; Peiffert D; Renard-Oldrini S
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(5):976-980. PubMed ID: 28694116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practically achievable maximum high-risk clinical target volume doses in MRI-guided intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a planning study.
Menon G; Huang F; Sloboda R; Pearcey R; Ghosh S
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 25085455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional planning techniques using an intravaginal multichannel balloon applicator for high-dose-rate gynecologic brachytherapy.
Park SJ; Chung M; Demanes DJ; Banerjee R; Steinberg M; Kamrava M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 24138921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of Intracavitary Applicator Placement for HDR Brachytherapy of Cervix Cancer.
Balsdon A; Timotin E; Hunter R; Diamond K
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Sep; 50(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 31311722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic MR-guided radiation therapy (SMART) and HDR brachytherapy boost in cervical cancer.
Dincer N; Ugurluer G; Mustafayev TZ; Serkizyan A; Aydin G; Güngör G; Yapici B; Atalar B; Özyar E
Brachytherapy; 2024; 23(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 38000958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical transition to model-based dose calculation algorithm: A retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate tandem and ring brachytherapy of the cervix.
Jacob D; Lamberto M; DeSouza Lawrence L; Mourtada F
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(3):624-629. PubMed ID: 28365083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of dosimetric parameters in the treatment planning of magnetic resonance imaging-based intracavitary image-guided adaptive brachytherapy with and without optimization using the central shielding technique.
Nishikawa R; Yoshida K; Ebina Y; Omoteda M; Miyawaki D; Ishihara T; Ejima Y; Akasaka H; Satoh H; Kyotani K; Takahashi S; Sasaki R
J Radiat Res; 2018 May; 59(3):316-326. PubMed ID: 29518234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
