These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34570298)

  • 1. Factors affecting perceived credibility of assessment in medical education: A scoping review.
    Long S; Rodriguez C; St-Onge C; Tellier PP; Torabi N; Young M
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2022 Mar; 27(1):229-262. PubMed ID: 34570298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients as Feedback Providers: Exploring Medical Students' Credibility Judgments.
    Eijkelboom MCL; de Kleijn RAM; van Diemen WJM; Maljaars CDN; van der Schaaf MF; Frenkel J
    Perspect Med Educ; 2023; 12(1):129-140. PubMed ID: 37064270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unfulfilled promise, untapped potential: feedback at the crossroads.
    Watling CJ
    Med Teach; 2014 Aug; 36(8):692-7. PubMed ID: 24597625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences.
    Telio S; Regehr G; Ajjawi R
    Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 50(9):933-42. PubMed ID: 27562893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.
    Xie H; Liu L; Wang J; Joon KE; Parasuram R; Gunasekaran J; Poh CL
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Aug; 13(7):177-212. PubMed ID: 26455855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feedback Credibility in Healthcare Education: a Systematic Review and Synthesis.
    Dai CM; Bertram K; Chahine S
    Med Sci Educ; 2021 Apr; 31(2):923-933. PubMed ID: 34457934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding Feedback for Learners in Interprofessional Settings: A Scoping Review.
    Coelho V; Scott A; Bilgic E; Keuhl A; Sibbald M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment.
    Schut S; Driessen E; van Tartwijk J; van der Vleuten C; Heeneman S
    Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 52(6):654-663. PubMed ID: 29572920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trainees' Perceptions of Feedback: Validity Evidence for Two FEEDME (Feedback in Medical Education) Instruments.
    Bing-You R; Ramesh S; Hayes V; Varaklis K; Ward D; Blanco M
    Teach Learn Med; 2018; 30(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 29240456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians.
    Watling C; Driessen E; van der Vleuten CP; Lingard L
    Med Educ; 2014 Jul; 48(7):713-23. PubMed ID: 24909533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning.
    Watling CJ; Ginsburg S
    Med Educ; 2019 Jan; 53(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 30073692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-regulatory learning theory as a lens on how undergraduate and postgraduate learners respond to feedback: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 66.
    Spooner M; Duane C; Uygur J; Smyth E; Marron B; Murphy PJ; Pawlikowska T
    Med Teach; 2022 Jan; 44(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 34666584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feedback and coaching.
    Atkinson A; Watling CJ; Brand PLP
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Feb; 181(2):441-446. PubMed ID: 34021400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning from clinical work: the roles of learning cues and credibility judgements.
    Watling C; Driessen E; van der Vleuten CP; Lingard L
    Med Educ; 2012 Feb; 46(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 22239333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feedback for Learners in Medical Education: What Is Known? A Scoping Review.
    Bing-You R; Hayes V; Varaklis K; Trowbridge R; Kemp H; McKelvy D
    Acad Med; 2017 Sep; 92(9):1346-1354. PubMed ID: 28177958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance.
    Sargeant J; Eva KW; Armson H; Chesluk B; Dornan T; Holmboe E; Lockyer JM; Loney E; Mann KV; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):636-47. PubMed ID: 21564201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feedback in clinical education: untying the Gordian knot.
    Weinstein DF
    Acad Med; 2015 May; 90(5):559-61. PubMed ID: 25406602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the influence of teacher-learner relationships on learners' assessment perception.
    Schut S; van Tartwijk J; Driessen E; van der Vleuten C; Heeneman S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2020 May; 25(2):441-456. PubMed ID: 31664546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.
    Issenberg SB; McGaghie WC; Petrusa ER; Lee Gordon D; Scalese RJ
    Med Teach; 2005 Jan; 27(1):10-28. PubMed ID: 16147767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The "educational alliance" as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.
    Telio S; Ajjawi R; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 2015 May; 90(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 25406607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.