These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34570544)

  • 21. A comparison of immediate serial recall and immediate serial recognition.
    Chubala CM; Neath I; Surprenant AM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 73(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 30556716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.
    Conlin JA; Gathercole SE; Adams JW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Nov; 58(8):1434-46. PubMed ID: 16365948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Similarity-based clusters are representational units of visual working memory.
    Son G; Oh BI; Kang MS; Chong SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 31070398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span.
    Oberauer K; Farrell S; Jarrold C; Pasiecznik K; Greaves M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):665-85. PubMed ID: 22141748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An examination of refreshing in between-category sequences.
    Langerock N; Wisniewski D; Brass M; Vergauwe E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):190-201. PubMed ID: 29744894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The tradeoff between item and order information in short-term memory does not depend on encoding time.
    Guitard D; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 36355706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The architecture of working memory: Features from multiple remembered objects produce parallel, coactive guidance of attention in visual search.
    Bahle B; Thayer DD; Mordkoff JT; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 May; 149(5):967-983. PubMed ID: 31589068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Where working memory meets long-term memory: The interplay of list length and distractors on memory performance.
    Loaiza VM; Halse SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1455-1472. PubMed ID: 30070565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.
    Vergauwe E; Cowan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1001-6. PubMed ID: 25361821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Separating the effects of visual working memory load and attentional zoom on selective attention.
    Lee H; Jeong SK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 32162967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fast-backward replay of sequentially memorized items in humans.
    Huang Q; Jia J; Han Q; Luo H
    Elife; 2018 Oct; 7():. PubMed ID: 30334735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Asymmetrical interference between item and order information in short-term memory.
    Guitard D; Saint-Aubin J; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):243-263. PubMed ID: 32833467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.
    Chunharas C; Rademaker RL; Brady TF; Serences JT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2300-2323. PubMed ID: 35191726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional refreshing moderates the word frequency effect in immediate and delayed recall tasks.
    Abadie M; Camos V
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 29756215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Hebb repetition effect in complex span tasks: Evidence for a shared learning mechanism with simple span tasks.
    Araya C; Oberauer K; Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):925-940. PubMed ID: 34870806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What I like is what I remember: Memory modulation and preferential choice.
    Aka A; Bhatia S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Oct; 150(10):2175-2184. PubMed ID: 33829821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do familiar memory items decay?
    Ricker TJ; Sandry J; Vergauwe E; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 31107048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.
    Scotti PS; Hong Y; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2506-2524. PubMed ID: 34014755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strategy-dependent effects of working-memory limitations on human perceptual decision-making.
    Schapiro K; Josić K; Kilpatrick ZP; Gold JI
    Elife; 2022 Mar; 11():. PubMed ID: 35289747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.