194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34570816)
1. A workflow for the relative quantification of multiple fish species from oceanic water samples using environmental DNA (eDNA) to support large-scale fishery surveys.
Ramón-Laca A; Wells A; Park L
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257773. PubMed ID: 34570816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental DNA provides quantitative estimates of Pacific hake abundance and distribution in the open ocean.
Shelton AO; Ramón-Laca A; Wells A; Clemons J; Chu D; Feist BE; Kelly RP; Parker-Stetter SL; Thomas R; Nichols KM; Park L
Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Mar; 289(1971):20212613. PubMed ID: 35317670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using eDNA sampling for species-specific fish detection in tropical oceanic samples: limitations and recommendations for future use.
Gonzalez Colmenares GM; Gonzalez Montes AJ; Harms-Tuohy CA; Schizas NV
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14810. PubMed ID: 36751629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the efficiency of open and enclosed filtration systems in environmental DNA quantification for fish and jellyfish.
Takahashi S; Sakata MK; Minamoto T; Masuda R
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231718. PubMed ID: 32310994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Got Glycogen?: Development and Multispecies Validation of the Novel Preserve, Precipitate, Lyse, Precipitate, Purify (PPLPP) Workflow for Environmental DNA Extraction from Longmire's Preserved Water Samples.
Edmunds RC; Burrows D
J Biomol Tech; 2020 Dec; 31(4):125-150. PubMed ID: 33100918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring of environmental DNA from nonindigenous species of algae, dinoflagellates and animals in the North East Atlantic.
Knudsen SW; Hesselsøe M; Thaulow J; Agersnap S; Hansen BK; Jacobsen MW; Bekkevold D; Jensen SKS; Møller PR; Andersen JH
Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 821():153093. PubMed ID: 35038516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples.
Thomsen PF; Kielgast J; Iversen LL; Møller PR; Rasmussen M; Willerslev E
PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e41732. PubMed ID: 22952584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes.
Thomsen PF; Møller PR; Sigsgaard EE; Knudsen SW; Jørgensen OA; Willerslev E
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165252. PubMed ID: 27851757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of fish environmental DNA reveals higher sensitivity achieved through targeted sequence-based metabarcoding.
McCarthy A; Rajabi H; McClenaghan B; Fahner NA; Porter E; Singer GAC; Hajibabaei M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Apr; 23(3):581-591. PubMed ID: 36366953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of sediment and stream transport on detecting a source of environmental DNA.
Nevers MB; Przybyla-Kelly K; Shively D; Morris CC; Dickey J; Byappanahalli MN
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244086. PubMed ID: 33370371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas.
Gold Z; Sprague J; Kushner DJ; Zerecero Marin E; Barber PH
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0238557. PubMed ID: 33626067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
Miya M
Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental DNA as a tool to reconstruct catch composition for longline fisheries vessels.
Green ME; Hardesty BD; Deagle BE; Wilcox C
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10188. PubMed ID: 38702492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endpoint PCR coupled with capillary electrophoresis (celPCR) provides sensitive and quantitative measures of environmental DNA in singleplex and multiplex reactions.
Thalinger B; Pütz Y; Traugott M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254356. PubMed ID: 34297715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating environmental DNA detection of a rare fish in turbid water using field and experimental approaches.
Holmes AE; Baerwald MR; Rodzen J; Schreier BM; Mahardja B; Finger AJ
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16453. PubMed ID: 38188170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distribution and seasonal differences in Pacific Lamprey and
Ostberg CO; Chase DM; Hayes MC; Duda JJ
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4496. PubMed ID: 29576966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Broad-scale eDNA sampling for describing aquatic species distributions in running waters: Pacific lamprey Entosphenus tridentatus in the upper Snake River, USA.
Young MK; Isaak DJ; Nagel D; Horan DL; Carim KJ; Franklin TW; Zeller VA; Roper B; Schwartz MK
J Fish Biol; 2022 Nov; 101(5):1312-1325. PubMed ID: 36053967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR.
Pont D; Meulenbroek P; Bammer V; Dejean T; Erős T; Jean P; Lenhardt M; Nagel C; Pekarik L; Schabuss M; Stoeckle BC; Stoica E; Zornig H; Weigand A; Valentini A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Feb; 23(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 36151931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fishing for fish environmental DNA: Ecological applications, methodological considerations, surveying designs, and ways forward.
Yao M; Zhang S; Lu Q; Chen X; Zhang SY; Kong Y; Zhao J
Mol Ecol; 2022 Oct; 31(20):5132-5164. PubMed ID: 35972241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating fish abundance and biomass from eDNA concentrations: variability among capture methods and environmental conditions.
Lacoursière-Roussel A; Rosabal M; Bernatchez L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Nov; 16(6):1401-1414. PubMed ID: 26946353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
