214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34570866)
1. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars.
França FM; Tenuti JG; Broglio IP; Paiva LE; Basting RT; Turssi CP; do Amaral FL; Reis AF; Vieira-Junior WF
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Aug; 34(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 34570866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations in High C-factor Cavities.
de Oliveira ILM; de Brito OFF; de Melo Monteiro LMCGQ; Resende Montes MAJ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 33025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentin µTBS and Hardness of Bulk-fill and Conventional Composites Placed in a Box-shaped Cavity Preparation.
Silame FDJ; Geraldeli GP; Sinhoreti MAC; Pires-de-Souza FCP; Roulet JF; Geraldeli S
J Adhes Dent; 2017; 19(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 29152619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flexural Strength of Conventional or Bulk-fill Resin Composite Repaired with High- or Low-viscosity Restorative Materials.
Foscarini AV; Barros LS; Turssi CP; França F; Basting RT; Vieira WF
Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):677-688. PubMed ID: 37881103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the Porosity from Incremental and Bulk Resin Composite Filling Techniques on the Biomechanical Performance of Root-Treated Molars.
Pereira R; Soares P; Bicalho AA; Barcelos LM; Oliveira L; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2021 Mar; 46(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 34192325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
Jung JH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.
Leprince JG; Palin WM; Vanacker J; Sabbagh J; Devaux J; Leloup G
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24874951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture Load of Molars Restored with Bulk-fill, Flowable Bulk-fill, and Conventional Resin Composite After Simulated Chewing.
Guerra L; Ramos RQ; Linhares LA; Bernardon JK; Favero SS; César PF; Júnior SM
Oper Dent; 2023 May; 48(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 36656317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites.
Rizzante FAP; Duque JA; Duarte MAH; Mondelli RFL; Mendonça G; Ishikiriama SK
Dent Mater J; 2019 Jun; 38(3):403-410. PubMed ID: 30918231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flowable fiber-reinforced versus flowable bulk-fill resin composites: Degree of conversion and microtensile bond strength to dentin in high C-factor cavities.
Harp YS; Montaser MA; Zaghloul NM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):699-706. PubMed ID: 35274436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of bulk-fill versus conventional nanocomposite resin restorations supporting the occlusal rests of removable partial dentures: An in vitro investigation.
Mesallum EE; Abd El Aziz PM; Swelem AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):907.e1-907.e7. PubMed ID: 37100650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interfacial Properties and Bottom/Top Hardness Ratio Produced by Bulk Fill Composites in Dentin Cavities.
Chaves LVF; Oliveira SN; Özcan M; Acchar W; Caldas MRGR; Assunção IV; Souza ROAE; Borges BCD
Braz Dent J; 2019; 30(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 31596332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of extended light activation and increment thickness on physical properties of conventional and bulk-filled resin-based composites.
de Mendonça BC; Soto-Montero JR; de Castro EF; Kury M; Cavalli V; Rueggeberg FA; Giannini M
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 34826031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interfacial Stress and Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill or Conventional Composite Resins to Dentin in Class II Restorations.
Duarte JCL; Costa AR; Veríssimo C; Duarte RW; Calabrez Filho S; Spohr AM; Borges GA; Correr-Sobrinho L
Braz Dent J; 2020; 31(5):532-539. PubMed ID: 33146338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
