180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34571439)
21. Short and long-term outcomes of three-dimensional printed surgical guides and virtual surgical planning versus conventional methods for fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible: Decreased nonunion and complication rates.
May MM; Howe BM; O'Byrne TJ; Alexander AE; Morris JM; Moore EJ; Kasperbauer JL; Janus JR; Van Abel KM; Dickens HJ; Price DL
Head Neck; 2021 Aug; 43(8):2342-2352. PubMed ID: 33786910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and Precision of the Computed Tomographic Angiography Perforator Localization Technique for Virtual Surgical Planning of Composite Osteocutaneous Fibular Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction.
Ettinger KS; Morris JM; Alexander AE; Nathan JM; Arce K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Aug; 80(8):1434-1444. PubMed ID: 35461799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) in Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction.
Vyas K; Gibreel W; Mardini S
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2022 May; 30(2):239-253. PubMed ID: 35501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Virtual surgical planning for maxillary reconstruction with the scapular free flap: An evaluation of a simple cutting guide design.
Tran KL; Kwon JY; Gui XY; Wang E; Yang D; Durham JS; Prisman E
Head Neck; 2023 Jan; 45(1):115-125. PubMed ID: 36255135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The state of virtual surgical planning in maxillary Reconstruction: A systematic review.
Chan TJ; Long C; Wang E; Prisman E
Oral Oncol; 2022 Oct; 133():106058. PubMed ID: 35952582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The use of 3D virtual surgical planning and computer aided design in reconstruction of maxillary surgical defects.
Glas HH; Vosselman N; de Visscher SAHJ
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Apr; 28(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 32102008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of time required for traditional versus virtual orthognathic surgery treatment planning.
Wrzosek MK; Peacock ZS; Laviv A; Goldwaser BR; Ortiz R; Resnick CM; Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1065-9. PubMed ID: 27102289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is There a Difference in Cost Between Standard and Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery?
Resnick CM; Inverso G; Wrzosek M; Padwa BL; Kaban LB; Peacock ZS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 74(9):1827-33. PubMed ID: 27181623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes: A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons.
Tang L; Day AT; Lee R; Gordin E; Emerick K; Patel UA; Deschler DG; Richmon JD
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(1):102291. PubMed ID: 31732308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results.
Roser SM; Ramachandra S; Blair H; Grist W; Carlson GW; Christensen AM; Weimer KA; Steed MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 68(11):2824-32. PubMed ID: 20828910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Impact of Virtual Surgical Planning on Orthognathic Surgery: Contributions From Two Specialties.
Chen J; Abousy M; Girard A; Duclos O; Patel V; Jenny H; Redett R; Yang R
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 33(5):1418-1423. PubMed ID: 35258010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Virtual surgical planning for mandibular reconstruction in an abbreviated admission pathway.
Speed OE; Rickels KL; Farsi S; Merrill T; Gardner JR; King D; Sunde J; Vural E; Moreno MA
Am J Otolaryngol; 2024; 45(3):104141. PubMed ID: 38194889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants Through Virtual Surgical Planning and Three Different Techniques: Double-Barrel Flap, Implant Dynamic Navigation and CAD/CAM Mesh With Iliac Crest Graft.
Antúnez-Conde R; Salmerón JI; Díez-Montiel A; Agea M; Gascón D; Sada Á; Navarro Cuéllar I; Tousidonis M; Ochandiano S; Arenas G; Navarro Cuéllar C
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():719712. PubMed ID: 34676161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mandible reconstruction with free fibula flaps: Outcome of a cost-effective individual planning concept compared with virtual surgical planning.
Rommel N; Kesting MR; Rohleder NH; Bauer FMJ; Wolff KD; Weitz J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1246-1250. PubMed ID: 28606440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Virtual Tumor Boards for Remote Learning in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology.
Papazian MR; Chow M; Weed D; Liu JC; Bewley AF; Moore MG; Givi B
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Oct; 149(10):899-903. PubMed ID: 37615974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Black Bone MRI for Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.
Vyas KS; Suchyta MA; Hunt CH; Gibreel W; Mardini S
Semin Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 36(3):192-198. PubMed ID: 36506277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In-House Surgeon-Led Virtual Surgical Planning for Maxillofacial Reconstruction.
Abo Sharkh H; Makhoul N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Apr; 78(4):651-660. PubMed ID: 31843280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improved Temporomandibular Joint Position After 3-Dimensional Planned Mandibular Reconstruction.
Sawh-Martinez R; Parsaei Y; Wu R; Lin A; Metzler P; DeSesa C; Steinbacher DM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 27649463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of 3D virtual planning on reconstruction of mandibular and maxillary surgical defects in head and neck oncology.
Witjes MJH; Schepers RH; Kraeima J
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Apr; 26(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29470184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Institutional-based and commercial virtual surgical planning in maxillomandibular reconstruction - Comparing the digital plan and postoperative scan.
Johal M; Ma JNB; Parthasarathi K; Dunn M; Howes D; Wallace C; Palme CE; Leinkram D; Cheng K; Clark JR
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Apr; 75(4):1399-1407. PubMed ID: 34952809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
